Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,301   Posts: 1,536,113   Online: 836
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1

    c-41 mini lab retro fit

    Silly question from a long time listener, first time caller. Is it possible to totally automate the traditional darkroom process? As in the way color film and prints are automated. From developing the film, choosing the filter grades, the enlarger times, developing the paper and maybe even dodging and burning. Maybe even "retrofitting" an old color film and print minilab. All suggestions taken.

  2. #2
    fotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,095
    Quote Originally Posted by petejt21 View Post
    Silly question from a long time listener, first time caller. Is it possible to totally automate the traditional darkroom process? As in the way color film and prints are automated. From developing the film, choosing the filter grades, the enlarger times, developing the paper and maybe even dodging and burning. Maybe even "retrofitting" an old color film and print minilab. All suggestions taken.
    Yes, sort of. Program your brain to follow a repeatable routine, and after some practice, its pretty much automatic.
    Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com

  3. #3
    cmacd123's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Stittsville, Ontario
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    1,014
    there were automated B&W film processors for small commercial users. Kodak made one called the VERSAMAT.

    The old time photofinishers had dip and dunk processors to automate developing film, and "printers" and Paper processors to run off hundreds of prints in a relatively short time.

    Ilford Made (probaly bought and resold) a desk top processor which processed - washed and Dried ilfospeed paper in about a minute or two. that will an enlarger equipped with a light meter/timer and you could knock off prints quickly.

    Picking the contrast grade and deciding if and where to dodge and burn in are artistic decisions that I don't think most folks would want to leave to a machine no mater how clever it might be.
    Charles MacDonald
    aa508@ncf.ca
    I still live just beyond the fringe in Stittsville

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Allentown PA area
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    339
    I dunno, I tried that "spouse" add-on and while it worked, it wasn't optimal for my sanity. The programming of said add-on took a very long time, and it never produced very good results. Spouse also has a very good memory, and will remember the attempted (re)boots. Disposal of said system is also reputed to be extremely expensive with current regulations. This add-on also comes with optional equipment called "children" and these also are reported to be extremely expensive as well and nearly (if not completely) impossible to acceptably dispose of.

  5. #5
    AgX
    AgX is offline

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    8,531
    What is that "spouse" you both are talking about?

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,838
    Yes it is and we (and others ) do it.

    For our UK print service we have an adapted FUJI Frontier that images onto our Digital black and white RC paper and works in the same way as a colour minilab, but uses silver gelatin paper and monochrome chemistry.

    A few other people around the world use a similar system.

    Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin