Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,533   Posts: 1,572,710   Online: 802
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343

    ADOX SILVERMAX 100: Great film, not 100 ISO

    After buying a few rolls of this film and the Silvermax developer to develop it in for full effect, I have concluded that even processed normally, this film is bette suited to be shot at 200 ISO, possibly 400. With a tiny push, 800 is definitely possible for a very full range. An exposure test at 800, 400, 200, and 100 EI on the same roll processed as 100, (11 min 68F, 1 + 29) the 800 had the best tone separation. I found 100 to block up the highlights too much for my normal sun exposure I use with Tri-x (1/1000 at f-8 ISO 800 or 1/1000 f2.8 @100 in this case). The shadows have the best range at 100, but at 400 the highlights work the best. Ive attached a few examples. The last two examples of the stop sign in the alleyway are shot at 800 (100022) and 100 (100025). The rest are shot 1/1000 f2.8 in the sun.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Silvermax 100020.jpg   Silvermax 100019.jpg   Silvermax 100017.jpg   Silvermax 100022.jpg   Silvermax 100025.jpg  


  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Rome, Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    896
    What scanner did you use?

  3. #3
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by Alessandro Serrao View Post
    What scanner did you use?
    Alessandro,

    I used an Epson V750, but my observations were made from viewing the negatives through a loupe. At 800 ISO, the scene I photographed 4 times had lost deep shadow information, but at ISO 400 equivalent, there was no detail lost anywhere. At ISO 100, the highlights began to block up. The scene had a wide lattitude of about EV 16 to about EV 9 in the low useful shadows. I understand that some photographers may not agree with how I am describing my exposure, but either saying that each shot was at a different ISO, or giving its stop deviation, or the equivalent exposure all says the same thing. The point in the end is that this film seems to perform optimally when exposed at 400 ISO and developed as normal (at 100 ISO specs).

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    131
    Hey Nikanon,

    I applaud your tests and await more.

    I have found that 100 works for me using TD3 full stand for 1.5 hours. Go figure.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.3_Smax_25011.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	566.8 KB 
ID:	74600

    D76, XTOL, and PMK Pyro also work well for me at ei 100.

  5. #5
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by damonff View Post
    Hey Nikanon,

    I applaud your tests and await more.

    I have found that 100 works for me using TD3 full stand for 1.5 hours. Go figure.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.3_Smax_25011.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	566.8 KB 
ID:	74600

    D76, XTOL, and PMK Pyro also work well for me at ei 100.

    I'm normally a Tri-x at 800 shooter and develop it in something simple like FG7, D76, or other developers that give great tones and push fine one stop, although Tri-x hardly needs the push. I shoot between 10-15 rolls a week, so I'm not sure I can make the extra cost of this film worth it if it dosent really stand out at 800 ISO when I try it. It may just not be the film for my work, which is very quick and in very good or terrible light, but we will see. Maybe I'll enjoy shooting it every once in a while just to change up what's coming out of my camera.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    222
    Are you observations based on enlarger printing as well, or only scanning?

  7. #7
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by jerrybro View Post
    Are you observations based on enlarger printing as well, or only scanning?

    Jerry,

    Neither. I have stated above that I made a visual assessment of the negatives through a loupe. It is confirmed by scanning. Enlarging will do a bit better for the tones, but they were pretty blocked up at ISO 100 as seen on the negative. My experience with a densitometer agrees and use of one would likely support this. My exposures in the camera are based on my exposures I have established long ago with a spot meter, getting used to what is Zone III and Zone II out in the world where I live, and found that in the sun, 1/1000 at f8 and ISO 800 will properly expose all tones save those situations where white objects reflect it directly (which can be controlled of course).

  8. #8
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    Quote Originally Posted by damonff View Post
    Hey Nikanon,

    I applaud your tests and await more.

    I have found that 100 works for me using TD3 full stand for 1.5 hours. Go figure.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.3_Smax_25011.jpg 
Views:	131 
Size:	566.8 KB 
ID:	74600

    D76, XTOL, and PMK Pyro also work well for me at ei 100.
    By the way, this is a wonderful tonality for such a long development, I'm surprised there aren't halos or streaking

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Nikanon View Post
    By the way, this is a wonderful tonality for such a long development, I'm surprised there aren't halos or streaking
    Thanks - I was shocked by it too. Extremely diluted TD3 is wonderful. Check it out.

  10. #10
    Nikanon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    343
    I haven't tried TD3, what kind of developer is it? Sounds like it can be highly compensating, so I'm assuming the concentration is high? Is sodium sulfite a constituent?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin