Surprised no one's mentioned Fuji ACROS yet; I'm just beginning with it, but already like it very much--extremely fine grain, very sharp, and lovely tonality.
Originally Posted by rduraoc
I did in my first post...
Originally Posted by Maine-iac
I've shot quite a lot of Delta 100 as well as APX in fine grain as well accutance developers (D76, Stoeckler's, Rodinal, PCat, DS10). Delta reacts with a marked increase in grain and reduced sharpness to overdevelopment in accutance developers - especially Rodinal - and tends to look downright ugly this way. I have 6x6 negatives which I do not dare to print bigger than 7.5x7.5" as the fine detail falls apart otherwise. APX is much more forgiving when used with developers of high pH and developed for longer than optimal.
Originally Posted by BWGirl
When developed to a moderate CI or using developers of moderate pH, there is no contest: Delta is finer.
Originally Posted by modafoto
Funny, re curl: just the opposite is true with me. Perhaps the water?
FP4 is an excellent film but in my neck of the woods it is twice the price of APX 100. I also know from experience with Agfa films ( I still have IFF) that it will outlast me in storage.
I recently took APX 100 to Barbados. It had 3 doses of X-ray with no ill effect I can see (in fairness the TX also survived).
I developed in Xtol as I wanted to see how the grain would be. In an 11x14 print it is hard to find grain to focus on and the tonality is lovely even in clouds. Rodinal has higher apparent sharpness but more grain.
The secret with these films is not to expose highlights up on the film shoulder so far that they go pasty
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
I have used a fair amount of both FP4 plus and APX100. IMHO old tech films far better suit street and reportage. Less clinical looking and all things being equal, better mid tone seperation, which is important in an urban envoronment.......lots of Z4-6..... FP4 is finer grained and very good all round. It has a fairly straight upper curve and can be a bit like modern filoms in lacking much of a shoulder. APX is IMHO creamier and has better tonality. It is simply the most beautiful film I have ever used for portraits. It is however grainier and on a thinner base, which can be more prone to buckling on loading onto reels (in 120). Personally I would not go near Tmax, Acros (which I love for other things) for street but cannot comment on Delta 100 as I have not used that much. The modern films are also low on acutance which seriously screws up street images IMHO. TMAX, Acros and Delta are NOT sharp films as some have said! They have great resolution, but esp in the case of Tmax, their acutance is relatively poor and so apparent sharpness lags way behind the traditional films. Sharopness (acutance) and resolution are two very different things........Either FP4 or APX100 would allow either serious sharpness in Pyrocat/Pyro/FX39/Acutol and others or tonality and fine grain in Xtol/perceptol etc etc....or gritty sharp pronounced grain in rodinal/neofin etc. You would make a great succes from any of these. If you for for a Tgrain, don't be surprised when the shots lack easily apparrent bite, gritiness and that moodiness we normally associate with street. Just my opinion......
If have been using APX 100 for about 3 years now on a very regular basis. Probably around 250 rolls. It is great in Rodinal, xtol, and d-76.
My times are as follows:
xtol 1+1 9 @68
rodinal 1+25 8@68
rodinal 1+50 13@68
rodinal 1+100 20@68
These times are all at iso/asa 100.
I don't agree with the fine grain part but the tonality of this film is amazing.
I thought asking at this thread rather than putting this in its own.
Well, I loaned few Elinchrome flashes to shoot with this weekend. Went and bought APX100 for shootings. My problem is that those flashes are bit too powerful (and my livingroom is a bit small in size) so ASA100 is one stop too fast. How APX100 handles ASA50 exposing? What could possible developing times be? Checked MassiveDevChart and it recommends 11,5 mins. Any experience? out there?
Ps. Almost forgot, I'm developing in good old Rodinal and will shoot 35mm.
APX100 has been my bread-and-butter film for over 8 years now.
I really love it, and as it has been stated it reacts so differently in different developers that is amazing.
Grain is small enough, tonality is very good and it is a tad more contrasty than FP4+
I generally rate APDX100 as 100, for DDX and Rodinal, and it can be pushed 1 stop in DDX.
David's times are about right. I'd have to add DDX 1+9 13 minutes 68F, agitating only onnce per minute
And Rodinal 1+200, 2 hours in stand development (agoitate at start and then go eat a pizza)
I use FP4+ every once and then, is a very good film as well, works best in caffenol.
Mama took my APX away.....
I don't think there is much better than APX100 and Rodinal 1:50. APX100 has been my favorite film for a few years now. I've shot a decent amount of FP4+ and wasn't as impressed by it as I am with APX100, but it is still a great film too. APX100 looks good in WD2D+ too (really nice tones).