Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,205   Posts: 1,531,746   Online: 880
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    193

    Chromium intensification / cut film / re-development

    I have several films (135 and 120) that were developed at too low contrast. They need grade 4 at least, leaving little room for manipulation. The reason(s) why they turned out too low contrast is not the topic.

    I have ordered the chemicals to prepare chromium intensifier. The issue is that the films have already been cut in strips for storage. I intend to insert them in reels for intensification processing.

    First question is about drying. Either dry each strip, hanging from one corner (I have some mini-clips with just one tooth) with a second clip pulling from the opposite corner. Fairly easy with 135 (perforations); a little tricky with 120. Once dry, put away to flatten for a few days. Alternate method is to dry them while still on reels. Positive: no tricky manipulations, controlled curl, only lengthwise. Negative: risk of drying marks or worse, gelatin adhering to the reel, especially with 120, where the image edge is close to the film edge.
    Advice from members with actual experience is welcome.

    Second question. I need to gain the equivalent of 1 to 1.5 paper grade. I see that the amount of HCl in the working strength bleaching solution can be between 2.5 and 12.5cc for 1000cc. With the lesser amount giving more intensification. Could someone provide a starting point, in view of my goal of 1-1.5 paper grade intensification? Of course I'll use non-keeper frames for preliminary tests, but some indication would be welcome.

    Third question. I have read that re-development should be with a developer with low sulfite content, with Dektol 1+3 suggested. I'm also concerned about grain if re-deloping in Dektol. In view of these concerns, is there any advantage in preparing a custom developer with even less sulfite? Say, take D-76 and decrease sulfite to, say, 50g, or whatever?

    Thank you.

  2. #2
    ParkerSmithPhoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    797
    Images
    6
    Try selenium 1:1 on a spare piece of film. It can work wonders to boost contrast. This is a favorite of John Sexton.
    Parker Smith Photography, Inc.
    Atlanta, GA

    Commercial & Fine Art Photography
    Portrait Photography

  3. #3
    Rudeofus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,589
    Images
    10
    The main question I would ask myself: is printing at grade 4, or even 5 so much of an issue that it warrants a procedure with toxic chemicals and possibly some loss in image quality? I'm all for experimenting and learning, but risking perfectly printable negatives to some mostly procedural improvements ...
    Trying to be the best of whatever I am, even if what I am is no good.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,769
    Selenium is not going to give you the density you need. With luck you can get 1 paper grade.

    Use a tray and do one strip at a time. You need to see what you are doing during the process.

    Any intensifier is going to increase the grain a bit. One is trying to obtain a usable negative. Like so many things in photography you can't have both.

    Chromium intensification can be repeated more than once. If desired the last intensified image can be toned with selenium for greater density and permanence. Some people use a staining developer rather than a print developer.

    First test the process on a negative that is not valuable.
    Last edited by Gerald C Koch; 01-11-2014 at 11:08 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  5. #5
    David Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    391
    I would suggest that you try the following:

    Film:
    Selenium tone one strip of film (5 – 10 minutes) - this is much less risky than intesification

    Printing:
    Use Dokumol diluted 1 + 6 and develop for AT LEAST 3.5 minutes

    If you can't get hold of Dokumol then mix up your own Ilford ID-55 and use at 1 + 3:

    Metol . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 2 g
    Sodium Sulphite anhyd . . 40 g
    hydroquinone . . . . . . . . 12.5 g
    Sodium Carbonate . . . . . 72 g
    Potassium Bromide . . . . . 1.5 g
    Water to . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 litre

    Combining the Selenium toning of the film with either Dokumol or ID-55 for the prints will give you an effective increase of contrast of +1 grade.

    Bests,

    David
    www.dsallen.de

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    193
    Thank you to all who took the time to respond so far.
    I had tried selenium before and got a minimal increase of contrast. Plus, once toned, that's final. See reply by G.Koch.
    Printing on grade 4 (or 5, which would more properly called 4.5, at least for Ilford Multigrade; look at their published curves) leaves no room if I need to, e.g. burnin shadows at higher grade to give them punch.
    ID-55 don't know, but I have already tried ID-14 and got maybe 1/2 grade gain at most. Dokumol I can buy, sure, but I would rather use it to rescue old paper (combined with benzotriazole).
    Regarding grain increase associated by intensification. Experiment will have the final word, but Barry Thornton states that, contrary to a commonly stated opinion, the way to have prominent grain is to develop to a low contrast and print using a high grade paper, rather than the opposite (for equal final contrast).

    As it happens, between the original post and now, I received Fred Picker's Zone VI Workshop. Quoting from top of page 1:
    Almost all students think that their major technical problem is printing. They are not aware that in almost every case their negatives are not just good enough to produce fine prints.
    Accordingly, I'll try intensification (selenium alone, chromium followed by selenium) of the negative before trying to squeeze a true grade 5, or more, out of Multigrade. You might say that to follow Fred Picker's advice fully, I should shoot again the pics. Most of them are northern Chile, 14+2 flight hours from here.
    Last edited by bernard_L; 01-11-2014 at 12:31 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,314
    I've never had great success with bleach/redevelop intensification on small format films. It's always a last-ditch effort to save an image. Selenium does work, but it will only give you about 1 grade of contrast increase, as others have said.

    One suggestion before you reprocess your irreplaceable tiny 35mm images: Scan them. A decent scanner can do miraculous things with a thin, flat negative. Once you've saved your images in digital form, have at it with the intensification process, and good luck.

    Somewhere on this forum is the suggestion to bleach thin negatives, expose them to light, and reprocess them in a staining developer to boost contrast. If more contrast is needed, selenium intensify the stained negatives.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Downers Grove Illinois
    Posts
    1,050
    Victors intensifier. Add contrast, remove with fix. Components maybe difficult to obtain but it works a treat.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Southern USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,769
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronald Moravec View Post
    Victors intensifier. Add contrast, remove with fix. Components maybe difficult to obtain but it works a treat.
    Also extremely poisonous and not considered archival.
    A rock pile ceases to be a rock pile the moment a single man contemplates it, bearing within him the image of a cathedral.

    ~Antoine de Saint-Exupery

  10. #10
    David Allen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Berlin
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    391
    I had tried selenium before and got a minimal increase of contrast.
    This is because you need to use it much stronger than for archival treatment of a print.

    Dokumol I can buy, sure, but I would rather use it to rescue old paper (combined with benzotriazole).
    Why? "to rescue old paper" – your stated problem was to increase contrast and this is exactly what Dokumol and Ilford ID-55 will give you.

    Bests,

    David
    www.dsallen.de

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin