B&W reversal film speed question
I know that it is normal practice, for some, to over expose their B&W film. I also know that it is a no no to over expose slide film, better to under expose if you have to. So what about black and white film for reversal? I love doing reversal processing with normal (?) black and white film.
I never really thought about it until today, when i was taking some pix of some Canadian geese. should i expose the film at box speed, my rated speed for ned processing based on testing or bracket and figure it out? i did it at box speed as i have alwasys done nwith my specific film for rev processing. anyway....
what are your thoughts on this? film speed of B&W film for rev processing vs normal neg processing?
BW reversal processing is not like E6 or other standardized processes. You can have different developers in different strengths with different developing times. So exposure depends on more things than just being a reversal.
Projection of the reversal is the most forgiving of exposure. Like E6, under exposure has little bad effects and does protect the highlights. Scanners typically will have issues with the amount of DR and exposure should be the greatest possible without blowing the highlights.
When you get comfortable with reversal processing, it's not that more complicated than neg processing when dealing with an under or over exposed film. Just one developer time to tweek.
Get it right in the camera, the first time...
Depends on the developer recipe. I've done Tri-X at 3200.
When I used Panatomic-X for reversal processing, the rated speed recommended in the reversal chemistry kit was 80 (where the film normally is rated at 32). So the process does determine the speed and it could be different than the box speed.
I would believe that you want to maintain proper exposure, over exposure would be harsh to view projected... So err on the side of underexposure as mrred says. But since you are working with reversal, instead of exposing for the shadows, you would expose to keep from blowing out the highlights (or expose to make the important tone, such as people, look correct).
I've oft wondered what the good is in pursuing reversal of B&W film, when the film base itself already added unwanted density. In other words, makes the projector lamp much more dim. A 500W bulb or whatever is much dimmer by the time it penetrates just the film base alone. So what's the point in reversal processing, if there is no clear base film?
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
So what's the point in reversal processing, if there is no clear base film?
There are some clear base films that are meant to be reversed, like the Adox Silvermax or Fomapan R 100.
In fact, it is said the same emulsion from which Silvermax is cut, it is also used for a Super8 film.
Have a look here: http://www.adox.de/english/ADOX%20Fi...MAX_index.html
And here: http://www.foma.cz/en/catalogue-foma...100-detail-273
Zenit 11, 12XP
Nikon F4, F4S, F401S, F601, F801, F801S, F50, F55, F60, F65, F70, F75, F80, F90, F90X, EL2, FE, FM, FG, FG-20, EM
Another thing to consider, with E6 disappearing those of us who want to project slides will have little choice than to go to B&W.
Originally Posted by Tom1956
SRT-102 | XD-5 | XD-11 | XE-7 | Hi-Matic 9 | Hi-Matic 11 | Sears 35RF | Minolta 5D | Sony A300 | Mamiya C220 | Bronica SQ-a | Yashica YK | Minolta Maxxum 7000 | Pentax K1000 | Speed Graphic 23
I've been doing a fair bit of experimenting with FP4 reversal processing lately. To address the OP's question of over/under exposure - expose correctly for the brightest part of the scene or for your subject if that doesn't happen to be the brightest part. Underexposure (even a modest amount) leads to an overall appearance of muddiness. Overexposure, of course, burns out the highlights. When you get the exposure spot-on, it really shows. Bracketting by half a stop is a good idea if you want to be sure. The last little niggle that I'm trying to resolve is a slight tendency for the blacks not to be quite black enough and to exhibit a dark green hue when examined closely on projection with a 250W carousel. I have a feeling that the cause could be that I'm using well outdated Ilford Motion Picture stock and the faint base fog that I see in normal negatives which isn't an issue and I can print through actually gives a slight lightening of the blacks under reversal. I'm being picky, and other people (non-photographers) can't see what I'm fussing about! Anyway, to try to prove a point I bought a ***NEW*** roll of FP4 yesterday (exp date 2018!) and will try that. My camera won't know what's hit it. I can't remember the last time I used in-date film!
Tom1956 - Yes, there is some base colouration with most b/w film, but a) some films don't have any (as has been mentioned) and b) even base colouration that is visible when a neg is held up to the light has never been a problem for me when projected. I have no issues with brightness with my usual 250W carousel. As donkee says, there is an element of Hobson's Choice. With E6 films fast disappearing, part of my reason for b/w reversal is to maintain the ability to shoot slides. The other part is that a decent b/w slide of the correct subject matter has a lot of impact.
Apart from the availability of colour slide film, the cost of the stuff and of the processing are beginning to make me think twice every time I press the shutter. I can see the time when I'll take two cameras on a trip, one for b/w slides and one for colour. Most of the material would be b/w with expensive colour reserved for subjects that demanded it.
Another option for those of us who like to project images is, of course, to use colour neg film and scan it. A club I belong to (nothing to do with photography) has just bought an Acer video projector using DLP technology. It cost a shade over £300, produces a very sharp, bright picture with auto keystone correction and excellent colour rendition. That and a slide scanner do introduce the 'd' word but do at least allow us to continue shooting film for ultimate projection.
Black is what it should to be - no light is black. Check out an E6 chrome; same thing. If the image of your reversals are too dark you have under exposure / under development. That would be something different.
Originally Posted by Tom1956
The images in my gallery are reversals and they all have jet-black edges.
Get it right in the camera, the first time...
I have done many rolls of B&W reversal before. it was just that yesterday when i was out shooting, i decided to shoot 2 rolls of the same things, dev 1 normally, in pyro and the other in reversal to see the difference. more of an experiment than anything else. I have to say that the frames i did before on reversal, the grain is much finer than the same film developed normally (I used to use D76 before). I just saw it when i was scanning through some older shots.
I have tried many films for reversal processing and odly enough the one that has given me the best luck has been the Ultrafine Xtreme 100. there are rumors about who makes this film. some say its Orwo 54 stock and others say ilford Pan 100. either way it does a great job and is really inexpensive in 100 foot rolls. I just got a few of the 120 to try out so 1 roll will be done today for reversal.
here is an example result. not the greatest shot, i was just trying to find scenes with contrast to check out the process.