Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,973   Posts: 1,558,700   Online: 838
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Kalix, Sweden
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    29

    old film & changes in characteristics

    Has anybody experienced any specific and possibly
    repeatable effects on the result when using old or severely
    outdated film not stored in cold/freezer.

    If so, what was the differences compared to same film fresh?

    Any general knowledge on how film aging affects contrast,
    density, grain and other parameters?


    Thanks in advance,

    Jan J

  2. #2
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    The aging of film will result in "degradation" of the image. Exactly what degradation IS depends on *many* factors, specific time. temperature, humidity .. some will say gamma ray exposure. The "expiration date" on each box - or the film itself - is usually pessimistic ... I've used film two and three years out of date - with no apparent change ... at the same time I've used film a few weeks after having been stored in adverse conditions and found it to have been destroyed.

    Black and white film will, it seems to me, lose contrast and definition. Color will have a shift towards a magenta bias. All this is objective observation - that is, my opinion... and I have no concrete proof. Film stored in a freezer, at -20C will probably last forever, and the expiration date becomes, for all intents and purposes, meaningless.
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  3. #3
    arkoshkobash's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    20
    I used some really old film that my Dad gave me, and it worked really good. It smelled like mildew when I put it on the reel, but there were no spots or anything on the film after it was developed. Maybe some film ages better than other film, or maybe this film was even way better when it was fresh.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    123
    Kodak's website states that cosmic radiation causes film (frozen or not) to slowly build up fog. This phenomenon is more pronounced in faster emulsions. Old-style films with lots of silver and a higher maximum density can be successfully used with higher levels of fog than the new thin-emulsion T-grain films which give you less room to maneuver.

    Time-wise, Kodak states that the safe storage life is five years. After that, tests must be run on the stored film to determine if it is useable.

    Probably something like Panatomic-X, Agfa 25 or Efke would be the most successful to store for long periods.

    Beware of old film manufactured prior to 1950. It may not be safety film, but rather old silver nitrate which by now has become explosive or at very least a spontaneous combustion fire hazard.

  5. #5
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by John Cook
    Beware of old film manufactured prior to 1950. It may not be safety film, but rather old silver nitrate which by now has become explosive or at very least a spontaneous combustion fire hazard.
    I think you are referring to the nitrocellulose base, a.k.a. celleophane, celluloid, or, when extruded, smokeless powder. I don't think it will ignite spontaneously, but boy, it WILL burn, and go boom! if enclosed.

    A LOT of the old movie theaters burned to the ground - a result of having nitrocellulose-based film in close proximity to HOT!! carbon arc lamps.

    One way to tell, from "Plastics 101": Take a strip and light it with a match. If it burns steadily and brightly , with a clear yellow flame, and little smoke, it is nitrocellulose. If it smolders and smokes, it is not.
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin