Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,231   Posts: 1,532,879   Online: 1089
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Prewashing film

  1. #1
    colrehogan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    St. Louis, MO
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    2,016
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    16

    Prewashing film

    How does prewashing film affect it? I thought it was merely to remove the anti-halation layer and makes the film more receptive to the developer. I've read in various places how you shouldn't prewash the Ilford FP4/HP5, yet I do and haven't had any problems that I know of. Is doing this wrong? Am I losing contrast because of it? I do pretty much the same 1 min water prewash with all my films.
    Diane

    Halak 41

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    47
    Ilford doesn't recommend a prewash, but I'm pretty sure they only do that because they don't believe it's necessary, not because they believe it hurts anything.

    I prewash all my films, both to help remove anti-halation layers (though the blessed elixir of Rodinal does that rather nicely on its own) and to help keep everything at a nice consistent temperature, and I'm a happy-scrappy hero pup.

    You should see the kool-aid green water that comes back out when I dump the prewash back out with Forte (Arista.edu) films!

  3. #3
    Wally H's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    NW Washington State, USA
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    160
    Images
    15
    I pre-wash films for two reasons:

    1) To help the film come to processing temp faster than otherwise...

    2) So that when developer is introduced it tends to cover the film in a more uniform manner. Sometimes developer can distribute itself unevenly on dry film and this can lead to uneven processing. Short development times will increase this risk. Air pockets are also less likely with a pre-wash. Air pockets can cause uneven developer distribution also.
    Regards,

    Wally

    Member:
    National Sarcasm Society
    (like we need your support)

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    61
    Also pre-wash to remove the colored dye backing on some films. The prewetting and washing is most important to make he development more even.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,054
    I read somewhere that some modern films, probably the T-grained, contain a developing agent which could be washed out in a pre-soak. I think that is why it is not recommended by some film companies.

    Perhaps Roger Hicks will see this and chime in. He seems to know quite a bit about emulsions.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    979
    I think that Ilford don't recommend pre-rinsing because it washes out some kind of wetting agent that is supposed to make development more uniform under some circumstances. That is confirmed by the pre-rinse water from HP5+ readily foaming (i.e. it looks as though it has detergent in it.)

  7. #7
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4
    Jim,

    I think you are referring to wetting agents in film emulsion, probably to speed up the penetration of developer into the emulsion and to guarantee a more even penetration in case your agitation scheme is poor - I know that Ilford uses these on some Delta emulsions, which you can notice by the foam that settles on the developers surface - no matter what developer you use.

    Pre-Soak is a similar method - since the emulsion is soaked with water, the penetration of developer is slightly delayed and it will soak in more evenly. Plus if you are not using one-shot developers but multiple-use or deep tank developers, presoak will protect these from contamination of the deep-blue anti halation and protective laquer used on Efke Rollfilms.

    There is a third use of presoak - Jobo recommends a 5min presoak (IIRC) if you apply your times for manual agitation on rotation developing.
    Tschüss,
    Roman

  8. #8
    rbarker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Rio Rancho, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,222
    Images
    2
    I pre-soak my Ilford films, too, and haven't had any problems.
    [COLOR=SlateGray]"You can't depend on your eyes if your imagination is out of focus." -Mark Twain[/COLOR]

    Ralph Barker
    Rio Rancho, NM

  9. #9
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by rjr
    ...
    There is a third use of presoak - Jobo recommends a 5min presoak (IIRC) if you apply your times for manual agitation on rotation developing.
    I think you will find that JOBO recommends a DRY 5 minute pre-warm as an added insurance against possible reticulation - especially important with C-41 or E-6 processing... where the processing temperature is significantly higher that ambient ~ depending ...

    I remember, from some time ago, that pre-soaking / wetting film was NOT recommended - something about emulsion swelling and degradation of the image.

    Personally, I DO pre-warm - or more properly, temperature stabilize (I use the JOBO CPP-2 for everything), and do NOT not prewet - on either film or paper.
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  10. #10
    rjr
    rjr is offline
    rjr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Mosel, SW Germany
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    Images
    4

    Jobo rec: Pre-Warm or Pre-Soak?

    Ed,

    I wasn´t referring to color processing and I am fully aware of the common mistake to read pre-warm as pre-wash - did that myself when i used E6 chemistry (Tetenal) first time.

    Pre-WARM is mandatory with E6 and C41, pre-WASH is forbidden there and optional for BW.

    I remember that Jobo handled the topic on the US "Jobo Quarterly", which can be found online at

    http://www.jobo-usa.com/jq/jq9802.htm#3982

    To quote:

    "Go back to the history of the story, and the answer is clear. JOBO was looking for a SIMPLE way to get customers successful in their processing. The presoak provided that simple "common denominator" that enabled us to tell customers, "Presoak for five minutes then process normally."

    What Kodak did was an enormous amount of testing, and published the results. Neither method is right or wrong. They both work well. If you are currently presoaking your film and getting the results you like, then keep on doing it. If you are starting without a presoak and you like the results, then keep on doing it. As I’ve said before, photography is not a pure science- it’s really alchemy. Enjoy it."

    So, we are both right. ;-)
    Tschüss,
    Roman

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin