Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,950   Posts: 1,557,894   Online: 920
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Loose Gravel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    921
    Images
    14

    How do I do B/W direct reversal?

    I'd like to make some negatives from my negatives. These would be contacts for masking purposes. Need to be continuous tone. Ortho film would be nice. 5x7 or 8x10 film. What is the best way to accomplish this? I know that Kodak's Direct duping film is gone. Is there a good way to do this directly, or should I use an inter-positive?

    Thanks all.
    Watch for Loose Gravel

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    At www.unblinkingeye.com there is a good article on the direct
    negative method. The exact reference I do not recall. Peruse.

    I think the method interesting for whole negative contrast
    control. May someday buy some Azo. Dan

  3. #3
    Loose Gravel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    921
    Images
    14
    Dan, thanks for the reference.

    Azo would not fix these problems.
    Watch for Loose Gravel

  4. #4
    hortense's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Riverside, CA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    612
    Images
    5
    For masks the last 4-years, I've used Arista 200. It cost is low and I've had no problems with it. For those that wish to have some light, I suggest using Freestyle's Arista APHS Ortho Lith using a ruby bulb for a safelight.

  5. #5
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    North Carolina, USA (transplanted from Seattle)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,845
    Seems to me I've read that both the Arista Ortho Lith (which is a relabeled Ilford product, I think) and Maco Genius Printing Film are capable of continuous tone when developed in common developers like Dektol; both are similar products to Kodalith, though I'm not sure of the safelight capabilities of Maco Genius.
    Photography has always fascinated me -- as a child, simply for the magic of capturing an image onto glossy paper with a little box, but as an adult because of the unique juxtaposition of science and art -- the physics of optics, the mechanics of the camera, the chemistry of film and developer, alongside the art in seeing, composing, exposing, processing and printing.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Toulouse, France
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    527
    Quote Originally Posted by Loose Gravel
    I'd like to make some negatives from my negatives. These would be contacts for masking purposes. Need to be continuous tone. Ortho film would be nice. 5x7 or 8x10 film. What is the best way to accomplish this? I know that Kodak's Direct duping film is gone. Is there a good way to do this directly, or should I use an inter-positive?

    Thanks all.
    Hi !
    As direct dupe (AKA SO-015 ) is gone, you have 2 otpions :
    1) go to internegative route : make a positive on film and repeat to get the awaited negative. (you have 2 possibilities to adjust contrast and density, this way)
    2) expose one film, and treat it in a B&W reversal chemical process. Simpler in theory but I wonder if it will be shorter in time or difficulty. But as your new negative is first generation copy, it may be less defect prone than the second generation copy you will get with option #1
    Time to lock yourself in the darkroom ;-)

  7. #7
    Loose Gravel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    921
    Images
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgesGiralt
    Hi !
    As direct dupe (AKA SO-015 ) is gone, you have 2 otpions :
    1) go to internegative route : make a positive on film and repeat to get the awaited negative. (you have 2 possibilities to adjust contrast and density, this way)
    2) expose one film, and treat it in a B&W reversal chemical process. Simpler in theory but I wonder if it will be shorter in time or difficulty. But as your new negative is first generation copy, it may be less defect prone than the second generation copy you will get with option #1
    Time to lock yourself in the darkroom ;-)
    George, I think you are right. All the reversal processes I've seen are pretty nasty chemicals. I think there is a third possibility, make a digital mask on acetate, but I don't have a printer.

    Thanks, LG
    Watch for Loose Gravel

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Liam Lawless recommends APH not APHS. That
    S is for silver down the drain.
    To read the article by Mr. Buffaloe, Search Google for,
    "less is more" aph . He also has the article at his site unblink. Dan



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin