Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,550   Posts: 1,544,751   Online: 956
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13

    Yipes! Tri X 320 in Xtol

    I wanted to shoot some green foliage with a red filter so instead of using my usual standard Efke R50, I opted for some TXP 120 that I had lying around, about a year past date but stored in temperate climate.
    I'm a stickler for critical process control and developed it in Xtol 1:1. The negs look fine. Density is great.

    Right now I am now printing them and YIPES!, The Grain! An 8x10 from 6x7 neg and it looks 35mm Tri X in Rodinal. I am new to Xtol and haven't done much with TXP 120 but have found the 35mm Tri X that I have done in it to have pretty fine grain.
    The prints look fine but the grain is totally unexpected. Any thoughts?
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  2. #2
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Sounds like my experience too Neal. When I was using Xtol, I went to 1:3 or full strength. The 1:3 dilution worked well. I have no idea how to technically account for the difference.

    If you want to see something really sharp withTri-X, try Xtol 1:3 with 10ml/liter Rodinal thrown in.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  3. #3
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Hawley
    If you want to see something really sharp withTri-X, try Xtol 1:3 with 10ml/liter Rodinal thrown in.
    I've actually tried that. It was only one roll so it wasn't really enough to make any concrete judgements from but I'm thinking that if want Xtol with more snap and slightly more pronounced grain, I might as well just go back to Good Ol', out-of the bag, D-76. I've used it on and off for 30 years and I'm beginning to wonder why I've ever bothered to try anything else for general purpose developing.
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  4. #4
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Good point Neal. Hard to beat Tri-X and D-76 1:1.
    Last edited by Alex Hawley; 06-06-2005 at 10:52 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: typo: correct D-26 to D-76
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,670
    If you want fine grain development then you need to use Xtol at full strength. This concentration provides the maximum amount of halide solvent action. (This also applies to any high sulfite developer such as D-76 or D-23.) Dilute Xtol is not a fine grain developer but rather an acutance developer.

    Excess grain can also be caused by negatives that are too dense either from over-exposure or over-development.

  6. #6
    SchwinnParamount's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tacoma, WA
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,017
    Images
    42
    Hmmm.. I've been doing the Tri-x 120 and Xtol 1:1 for a few years now. I've compared these negs with the same film in D76 (my old standby combo) and have never seen XTOL give me larger grain than D76. Of course, like Gerald said over-development could be the problem. I generally don't make super thick negatives. my style is to make them a tad on the thin side but with enough shadow detail to be printable.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin