Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,552   Posts: 1,544,918   Online: 888
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Gustavo_Castilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bryan Texas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    890
    Images
    143

    Under Expose elfke 25 can it be saved???

    I got some holder mixed and ended up under exposing some Elfke 25 ( the other holders had 100) I am planing to develop it on Fryday on rodinal 1: 25 or 1 :50 any tips on what may save the film?
    Gustavo Castilla
    We are not moved by things ,
    but by the views we take of them.
    Epictitus.
    My site
    My flicker page
    Facebook
    Contact

  2. #2
    Canuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Great White North
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    201
    Ouch! I did that a few weeks ago with 100 and 400 film. I bit the bullet and developed at the 100 ASA. My reasoning was that I can always get a print with a dense neg but an underdeveloped would be much more work. Luckily it was only 4 sheets of film and while it was dense, it was still printable. Another possibility is to choose the median development time and see what happens. If the difference only a minute, you are ok in most instances. Anymore, it gets to be interesting. Whatever method you choose, I hope it turns out to give a great print

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by castilg
    I got some holder mixed and ended up under exposing some Elfke 25 ( the other holders had 100) I am planing to develop it on Fryday on rodinal 1: 25 or 1 :50 any tips on what may save the film?
    Hi Gus, Efke 25 is a rather unforgiving film. I don't think you will be happy with Rodinal in this situation. I would suggest using a compensating developer. If you mix your own, you might consider trying Pextral's staining developer. See Ole's post in the Apug Chemical Recipes :

    http://www.apug.org/forums/article.php?a=120&page=2

    In any case, it would be a good idea to run some tests before commiting the film you are trying to save.

    Diafine and Microphen are other developers that are often used for push developing, for example.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    When I'm not sur about anything except that the exposure is probably wrong, I turn to stand development in half-strength FX-2. About 90 minutes without agitation has given printable negatives from even my worst gaffes.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5
    Donald Qualls's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    North Carolina, USA (transplanted from Seattle)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,845
    What I'd suggest is to try a single sheet in highly dilute developer (Rodinal or HC-110 have good reputations for this), with a long process and some, but not much agitation. In inversion tanks, I like to use HC-110 Dilution G (1:119 from USA concentrate, or from Euro "bottled stock solution" you can make Dilution E by the bottle label and then dilute 2 parts E to one part water); I agitate continuously for the first minute, then five inversions every 3 minutes. For normal contrast, I use 3x the published Dilution B time, which gives me shadow detail about 2/3 stop better than a "normal" process; with further extension of development (30-50% increase) you can get a one stop "push" that, at the cost of some loss in shadow detail, will act more or less like another stop of film speed.

    For Efke 25, there's no listing I can see for HC-110, but I'd estimate (based on D-76 and Rodinal times) that for this purpose you'd need about 28 to 31 minutes at 68 F/20 C, agitating every 3rd minute after the first. This is a strongly compensating process, so it generally avoids blocking highlights and is pretty forgiving, and it'll get the most possible shadow detail. As others have said, slow films are typically unforgiving, but this is the best option I know of to try to save the images.
    Photography has always fascinated me -- as a child, simply for the magic of capturing an image onto glossy paper with a little box, but as an adult because of the unique juxtaposition of science and art -- the physics of optics, the mechanics of the camera, the chemistry of film and developer, alongside the art in seeing, composing, exposing, processing and printing.

  6. #6
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    After shooting a bunch of this stuff, I'd say give it a try, but don't expect miracles. Tom's comment about "a rather unforgiving film" may be the understatement of the week. This stuff is not at all friendly with respect to exposure and development. Stick with Ole's suggestion and pray.

    If you were shooting a very flat subject, there might be enough exposure to get something which prints, but plan on reshooting. If it was full sunlight the effects will be interesting. This film builds contrast readily, but the cardinal sin for me is underexposure with Efke 25. I normally rate it at 12, but for azo I use 6 as my standard speed. Sure is nice for skin tones with proper exposure and does a good job on metallic surfaces as well. tim

  7. #7
    Gustavo_Castilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bryan Texas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    890
    Images
    143
    EXTOL rules I process the efke 25 on Xtol srtaight for 7 min It came out great
    thanks guys I tought to try one sheet as per John (J&C) specs and it worked
    Gustavo Castilla
    We are not moved by things ,
    but by the views we take of them.
    Epictitus.
    My site
    My flicker page
    Facebook
    Contact

  8. #8
    Gustavo_Castilla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Bryan Texas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    890
    Images
    143
    Gustavo Castilla
    We are not moved by things ,
    but by the views we take of them.
    Epictitus.
    My site
    My flicker page
    Facebook
    Contact



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin