Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,295   Posts: 1,535,668   Online: 1174
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,311
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    434

    Paper shopping... (Foma vs Kentmere vs Bergger)

    Well, I just got my first packs of Kentmere and Foma to try against my current house standard, Bergger. Initial notes - the Foma that I tried, the Chamois finish triple-weight semi-gloss vc fiber paper is quite nice. It has a real deep cream finish to the paper, and the paper stock has a pronounced tooth to it. The paper base itself is very warm, but the image is somewhat neutral, somewhat like an albumen print. It is a VERY slow paper - with a standard negative, I got a good exposure at 80 seconds at f32 for an 8x10 print.

    The Kentmere, on the other hand, is a bright white baryta base, with a neutral-to-cold tone. It is a much faster paper - 35 seconds at f45 for the same size print from the same negative. The paper base is very smooth and bright, but noticeably thinner than the Foma, and even a bit thinner than the Bergger, but still a double-weight.

    I'll post scans after the prints are dry - they're still washing away at the moment. I think the Foma chamois finish will have a place in my inventory, for limited usages. There will be times when I'll want that albumen-print look without the hassle of actually coating my own. The cold/neutral tone of the Kentmere doesn't do it for me, so I dont think I'll be using it to replace my Bergger.

  2. #2
    Bob F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,984
    Images
    19
    Which Kentmere paper? I have an image of a tulip in the gallery made on their Fineprint FBVC Warm which sounds somewhat similar to the Foma paper you mention (but it's faster and only double-weight). Like you with the Foma paper, I can see it having a use for the right kind of image.

    Cheers, Bob.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,645
    I've been using the Kentmere Bromide paper for cold-tone prints. Its about twice as fast as similiar Oriental Seagul paper and seems to have a longer scale printing into zone 8-9 with detail (as with AZO). For warmer-toned prints, you might try Forte Fortezo with Agfa Neutol WA or Ansco 130. I've yet to try their Polywarmtone paper but hear good things about it.
    van Huyck Photo
    "Progress is only a direction, and it's often the wrong direction"

  4. #4
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,311
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    434

    Scan samples

    Here are the two samples. The Foma is FomaTone MG classic, Chamois 542. The Kentmere is Fineprint VC.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails KentmereFinePrint.jpg   FomaWTchamois542.jpg  

  5. #5
    eagleowl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    127

    comparing the two...

    ...I can't decide which I like the most.
    The warm tones of the Foma give the print an atmospheric antique look-but the cooler tones of the other print look good too.
    Personally,I'd be more inclined to use the Foma more for artistic portraits,and possibly shots of old buildings-and the other paper for general use.
    A common mistake people made when designing something completely foolproof was to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.

    Computers are incredibly stupid,but they are capable of being incredibly stupid many millions of times a second.

    Both said by Doug Adams

    Only put off until tomorrow that which you are prepared to die having not done-Pablo Picasso



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin