Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,649   Posts: 1,481,288   Online: 749
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69

    Film developers in Jobo rotary processors

    I've heard that not all film developers work well with Jobo processors. I even heard something about Rodinal. Please don't tell me I won't be able to use Rodinal with a Jobo processor! How about ID-11/D-76, Ilfosol S, Perceptol?
    What are the "good" and "bad" developers?
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  2. #2
    L Gebhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    NH - Live Free or Die
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,672
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by arigram
    I've heard that not all film developers work well with Jobo processors. I even heard something about Rodinal. Please don't tell me I won't be able to use Rodinal with a Jobo processor! How about ID-11/D-76, Ilfosol S, Perceptol?
    What are the "good" and "bad" developers?
    X-Tol, D-76, DD-X, Pyrocat all work just fine in the Jobo. I haven't tried Rodinal. PMK is the only one I have had bad luck with in the Jobo.

  3. #3
    galyons's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Posts
    273
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by arigram
    I've heard that not all film developers work well with Jobo processors. I even heard something about Rodinal. Please don't tell me I won't be able to use Rodinal with a Jobo processor! How about ID-11/D-76, Ilfosol S, Perceptol?
    What are the "good" and "bad" developers?
    Ari,
    Never heard this. I have been using jobo drums for years. Pyro, D76, etc. with no problems. Post a tech question to Jobo. They are very responsive.

    Cheers,
    Geary
    But your flag decal won't get you into Heaven any more. They're already overcrowded from your dirty little war.
    Now Jesus don't like killin' no matter what the reason's for, and your flag decal won't get you into Heaven any more. – John Prine

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Pennines
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    146
    D-76 and ID-11 work really well, especially diluted 1+2. The poor Jobo motor then has up to 900ml to deal with. Diluted 1+1 is also good, but 1+2 is sharper. I once tried rodinal and the finished negs looked almost like lith film - at this point I should have experimented more - Rodinal is a high activity developer, and sure it will rotary process, (tests and more tests).

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    112
    Images
    3
    add DDX to the "it works" for the Jobo.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    958
    Rodinal works "OK" in a Jobo, fairly similar results to any of the other normal developers, but the high accutance, and sharpness that are possible with Rodinal at high dilution and minimal agitation don't acrue. To sum up, it provides a reasonable tonal range, but Pryocat is sharper in a Jobo.
    Take care,
    Tom

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    I in the past, have developed with Rodinal in a Unidrum/Uniroller processor with good results. I've never tried it in my Jobo, but it should work.

    However, I greatly prefer the "look" of film processed in Rodinal with minimum agitation.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    370
    Images
    5
    Ari,

    I have a trick that works well with both Rodinal and Pyrocat HD. I use the 1500 series tank with a magnetic drive coupler. I spin the tank for one minute, then take it off the magnet and let it stand in the corner of the waterbath, then just put it back on the magnet for a few seconds every two minutes, then let it spin for the final minute. Its the best of both worlds, partial stand in a JoBo, but demands more attention from you.

    Tim

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    299
    I have been using Rodinal in various dillutions in a Jobo ATL 1000 and 2300 for more than a decade with excellent results.

    Ted

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,626
    Quote Originally Posted by arigram
    I've heard that not all film developers work well with Jobo processors. I even heard something about Rodinal. Please don't tell me I won't be able to use Rodinal with a Jobo processor! How about ID-11/D-76, Ilfosol S, Perceptol?
    What are the "good" and "bad" developers?
    The first time I tried Rodinal was with Ilford D400 in a Jobo processor. The negs were quite thin compared to using ID11 with tank agitation and the prints did not seem any sharper than prints from negs developed in ID11. I wrote to Ed Buffalo who said that constant rotation in a Jobo would prevent the high accutance that was a key feature of Rodinal. The flat negs were probably the result of using too little Rodinal. Ed recommends a minimum of 5mls but the Jobo allows less than this for one 35mm film.at 1:50 dilution. He also suggested that in future I rate the D400 at ISO 200

    So I would tend to agree with most of the other replies. You can use Rodinal in a Jobo and get normal contrast but you may lose the accutance. If you use the part rotation and then the stand development routine that another correspondent suggested, I'd wonder whether a Jobo was worth using. You might as well use tank and hand agitation.

    I have just done Ilford SFX in Rodinal at 1:25 using 10 minutes and hand agitation. The negs are much better in terms of contrast compared to the D100 using the Jobo. This recommendation was based on Hugh Millsom's experience. His book on Infrared photography is very good. His time is much more than the Agfa recommendation for a 1:25 dilution with SFX but although I have yet to make prints, the negs look good.

    If you've used Rodinal by hand agitation then I'd be interested in the result of you using a Jobo for the same film. You could then make a direct comparison which I can't. Until you take the chance of losing accutance( or not) with a Jobo, you'll never know the answer. I suspect the difference of using a Jobo with Rodinal compared to hand agitation will not be one of disaster compared to glorious success but rather one of good prints compared to not quite so good but still usable prints . Based on my experience, using a Jobo will still give reasonable negs. My D100 negs and prints with the Jobo are not so bad I'd want to throw them away.

    You may lack water for FB printing but from my visits to your island you possess scenery in Crete( the Great Greek island) which most of us can only dream of.

    Best of luck.
    Pentaxuser

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin