Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,880   Posts: 1,520,470   Online: 979
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,194
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    435

    WD2D+ and stand development?

    Has anyone here used WD2D+ for stand development? What dilution do you use?

  2. #2
    David R Munson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    408
    Images
    5
    Time to resurrect this. Anyone tried it?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,054
    I love WD2D+, but I never thought of it for SD. Interesting thought. I was under the impression (wrongly?) that with a pyrogallic acid dev it had to be used with frequent agitation to prevent streaking and/or uneven devving.

    I know some folks here use catechol (pyrocat) for stand dev, but how much of a different critter is that stuff?

  4. #4
    David R Munson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Shanghai, China
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    408
    Images
    5
    Not sure, really. I was just wondering about it earlier when I was working on developing film.

  5. #5
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,194
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    435
    I ended up going down the Pyrocat HD road and never got around to trying out the WD2D kit I bought. Gosh, this is a 2 year old thread!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,054
    Flying, IDK about SD, but Tri-X loves WD2D+. IIRC, WD2D+ calls for frequent agitation, along the lines of PMK, but I don't have my notes with me. My mind can't keep up with all that (built for comfort, not for speed) and I just did the every 30 sec routine; TX came out fine! Actually, the firts roll I did was from a wedding, 120TX, and the tux looks black, the gown looks white, but with detail. I will be using that kit again! Give 'er a go, I think you'll like it.
    Last edited by jim appleyard; 11-06-2007 at 01:25 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: speling

  7. #7
    TheFlyingCamera's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Washington DC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    8,194
    Blog Entries
    51
    Images
    435
    I'm down a different path now... Ilford FP4+/HP5+ or (mostly now) Fomapan 200, in Pyrocat HD. I do mine in a Jobo 99% of the time, and I'm printing platinum (see my gallery here for examples). I'm well acquainted with the benefits of pyro processing, for silver as well as pt/pd. I've actually got a giant portfolio of silver stuff I need to print that I shot 2 1/4 and developed in PMK. It would be a great benefit for other folks coming along to hear about WD2D+ as a developer, as it doesn't get much press, between the old standbys of PMK and the current high visibility of Pyrocat HD and siblings. I'm happy enough now with Pyrocat HD though that I'm not looking to change soon.

  8. #8
    RobertP's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    ULarge Format
    Posts
    1,130
    Images
    8
    I use WD2D original formula and brush development. Works fantastic. But brush is also a constant agitation which seems to be the requirement with this pyro metol developer. I started with pyrocat hd but I like the stain of wimberly's formula somewhat better. But both are great developers.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,309
    I attended one of John Wimberley's workshops last summer. I used roll film with gentle, frequent agitation as directed in the data sheets accompanying WD2D+. Film came out nice and even, nice and sharp, nicely stained.

    John himself uses constant gentle agitation in trays for sheet film.

    This is a very good, proven developer. (Don't just take my word for it, try to see some of John's prints!) I'd suggest that if you want to find out if it works for stand development, that you give it a try with a roll/sheet of test film. That way, you'll know.

    As someone said in the posts above, a pyro/metol developer may deliver streaks unless agitated frequently. I have used PMK with reduced frequency of agitation with no trouble. This was by no means stand development, however. More like on the minute instead of on the 30 seconds.

    Peter Gomena

  10. #10
    gainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    3,726
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by jim appleyard View Post
    I love WD2D+, but I never thought of it for SD. Interesting thought. I was under the impression (wrongly?) that with a pyrogallic acid dev it had to be used with frequent agitation to prevent streaking and/or uneven devving.

    I know some folks here use catechol (pyrocat) for stand dev, but how much of a different critter is that stuff?
    Pyrogallol differs by 1 OH group from catechol and hydroquinone, and hydroquinone differs from catechol in the placement of one OH group around the benzene ring. All three give stain, each of different color, when used in developers with little or no sulfite. Pyrogallol is least sensitive to sulfite content of the three. All three are tanning agents as well, producing the familiar relief image which has some edge effects due to refraction.
    Gadget Gainer

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin