Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,706   Posts: 1,482,839   Online: 1007
      
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by mario Ag+ View Post
    Hi all, Is it posible to use Pot Ferricyanide on it's own
    (without Pot bromide ) as a print bleach. Mario.
    I've been digging into the chemistry of the process.
    I've not found anything of which I'm sure Mr. Rudman is
    not already well acquainted. As I previously mentioned, the
    silver is oxidized by the ferricyanide. Silver + ferricyanide =
    silver ferrocyanide.

    The ferrocyanide is insoluble so image integrity should
    be maintained through a P. F. treatment. Assuming your
    intention is to sepia tone, a P. F. minus bromide treatment
    may suffice. That is no bromide during or after treatment.
    Due to the extreme insolubility of silver sulfide it stands
    to reason that the silver will convert.

    At a minimum an interesting experiment would be a post
    rather than a during bromide treatment.

    You asked " is Pot Bromide essential ... ?" If so, I'd add
    when is it essential, during, after, either? Dan

  2. #12

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by dancqu View Post
    I've been digging into the chemistry of the process.
    I've not found anything of which I'm sure Mr. Rudman is
    not already well acquainted. As I previously mentioned, the
    silver is oxidized by the ferricyanide. Silver + ferricyanide =
    silver ferrocyanide.

    The ferrocyanide is insoluble so image integrity should
    be maintained through a P. F. treatment. Assuming your
    intention is to sepia tone, a P. F. minus bromide treatment
    may suffice. That is no bromide during or after treatment.
    Due to the extreme insolubility of silver sulfide it stands
    to reason that the silver will convert.

    At a minimum an interesting experiment would be a post
    rather than a during bromide treatment.

    You asked " is Pot Bromide essential ... ?" If so, I'd add
    when is it essential, during, after, either? Dan
    I'm not sure I quite understand your question Dan.
    Do you mean bleaching with plain Pot. Ferri (no bromide), then sepia toning, then adding bromide after toning? Why would you want to do this? Perhaps I missed the point?
    Tim

  3. #13
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Some of the "other metal" toners work without halides - like the blue iron toner.

    Adding halide after toning will probably have no effect at all. I say "probably" because I haven't tried it, although a strong salt (sodium chloride) solution is used as a clearing bath with the Colorvir toning kit (iron, zink and titanium toners).
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  4. #14
    Stoo Batchelor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hertfordshire, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,236
    Images
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by mario Ag+ View Post
    Hi all,
    Is it posible to use Pot Ferricynide on it's own (without Pot bromide ) as a print bleach. I'm thinking of making a 10% solution first and highly diluting it to give me more control. Will this work? or is Pot Bromide esential in print bleach.
    Mario.
    Hi

    This thread has horrified me.

    If I was to answer Marios question above, I would have said; 'Yes, of course it is Mario'

    Now reading through this thread, all the past prints that I have made are likely to self disruct over time. Could some one please tell me this is not going to happen.

    I print on Ilford Mg4 FB and wash and fix as per normal.
    The print is washed for 1 hr.
    The print is then slid in to a tray of 1ltr of water and 10ml of Ferri-stock(10gms ferri/100ml water, as per Les McLeans book)
    The tray and print is agitated sporadically throughout its 10 mins soak.
    The print is washed for 2 mins
    The print then enters a tray of sepia(tetenal non vario) for 10 mins
    The print is washed for 5 mins
    The print then enters a tray of selenium of either 1-9 or 1-4 for the desired effect.
    The print is washed for a further 30-45 mins
    The print then enters atray of 2x Alcha-Seltzer/1ltr R.O water for 1 min before the usual drying procedure.

    This is a routine that I have been using for some time now and I have not noticed any degradation of the final print over time. They all look as crisp as the day they were printed.
    Should I be adding some fix to my tray of weak ferri, and if so, how much?

    I thank you in early anticipation, and also appologise to Mario for asking a question on his thread.

    Kind Regards

    Stoo
    _____________________________________________

  5. #15

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by tim rudman View Post
    I'm not sure I quite understand your question Dan.
    Do you mean bleaching with plain Pot. Ferri (no bromide),
    then sepia toning, then adding bromide after toning?
    Why would you want to do this?
    Perhaps I missed the point?
    Tim
    I've not been trying to make a point. I've got some
    potassium ferricyanide on my list of to-buy chemicals
    when next I order from P. Formulary. I've taken the
    OP's question as an opportunity to investigate
    the matter.

    At least at first glance it would seem that bromide
    is not needed if a sulfide toner is to follow the bleach.
    Ole mentions "other metal" toners which work with
    out any halide.

    With the usual lights-on way of P. F. processing the
    re-exposure I mentioned is included. We know that the
    halides of silver are light sensitive. Now, what if the P. F.
    processing is done under, say, a red safelight? What then
    if the re-halogenated print is again put through a usual print
    developer? My guess, the print would not reappear. Would
    not because of it's P. F. processing under a red safelight.

    Besides silver ferrocyanide and the halides when
    present, I dare say several other compounds of silver
    could be generated with the appropriate chemical; that
    during or after a P. F. treatment. That you've mentioned
    at least with the halides or a mix thereof.

    But for some of those "Cool" moves that might be made
    re-exposure is necessary. So, the light sensitivity of what
    ever compound of silver results must be considered. The
    halides are sensitive and some what the soluble nitrate.
    Others I couldn't say. Dan

  6. #16
    gainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    3,726
    Images
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoo Batchelor View Post
    Hi

    Should I be adding some fix to my tray of weak ferri, and if so, how much?

    I thank you in early anticipation, and also appologise to Mario for asking a question on his thread.

    Kind Regards

    Stoo
    Not unless you want to lose the image. Fix + ferri = Farmer's Reducer. The image will not resurrect.

    Bromide is not the only halide. Non-iodized table salt will do. Canning salt is such. You get a silver chloride image which responds to sulfide for toning or which may be redeveloped in a staining developer for other purposes. Light is necessary for the latter. Sulfide will turn unexposed film or paper brown.
    Gadget Gainer

  7. #17
    Stoo Batchelor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hertfordshire, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,236
    Images
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by gainer View Post
    Not unless you want to lose the image. Fix + ferri = Farmer's Reducer. The image will not resurrect.

    Bromide is not the only halide. Non-iodized table salt will do. Canning salt is such. You get a silver chloride image which responds to sulfide for toning or which may be redeveloped in a staining developer for other purposes. Light is necessary for the latter. Sulfide will turn unexposed film or paper brown.
    Hi gainer

    Thanks for the reply.

    Sorry to dig deeper, and if i sound a bit dense here, but i want to get this straight. From what you are saying, I assume that all is o.k with my toning routine? As I am only slightly bleaching out the highlights with the ferri, as soon as I enter the print in to the sepia toner, any un-developed silver is re-developed, providing that I use a sulphide toner.

    Just one other question, if I may?; Would a Sepia toner made out of Thiourea do the same job as the sulphide based sepia toner, i.e; re-develop any un-developed silver?

    Kind regards

    Stoo
    _____________________________________________

  8. #18

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoo Batchelor View Post
    Hi gainer

    Thanks for the reply.

    Sorry to dig deeper, and if i sound a bit dense here, but i want to get this straight. From what you are saying, I assume that all is o.k with my toning routine? As I am only slightly bleaching out the highlights with the ferri, as soon as I enter the print in to the sepia toner, any un-developed silver is re-developed, providing that I use a sulphide toner.

    Just one other question, if I may?; Would a Sepia toner made out of Thiourea do the same job as the sulphide based sepia toner, i.e; re-develop any un-developed silver?

    Kind regards

    Stoo
    Perhaps I can add my comments here too Stoo.
    'Gainer' is right about fixer + ferri = Farmer's reducer, which is non reversible. This is also important as you must take care to properly remove fixer from the paper too, before putting it into your ferri/halide bleach.

    "As I am only slightly bleaching out the highlights with the ferri, as soon as I enter the print in to the sepia toner, any un-developed silver is re-developed, providing that I use a sulphide toner"

    Correct - provided that you tone to completion.

    "Would a Sepia toner made out of Thiourea do the same job as the sulphide based sepia toner, i.e; re-develop any un-developed silver?"

    Yes, this is correct. Plus you have the advatages of no bad smell and you can pick from a range of colours from thiourea, by altering the hydroxide amount that is added to it. In kits this usually comes as a 3rd bottle of 'additive'.
    There are other ways you can alter the outcome too by adding a different halide (eg kosher salt) to the bleach, by adding a little B&W developer, by putting in toner before bleaching etc etc.

    Re halides - you can use bromide or chloride as previously stated, or a mix. Iodide is also usable but much trickier. If interested, there is a write up on this in my toning book under FSA toner (too long to retype here!)
    Tim

  9. #19
    Stoo Batchelor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Hertfordshire, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,236
    Images
    42
    Phew, I can rest at night now!

    Tim,

    Thanks for taking the time out to answer my Question. I have actually ordered the raw chemicals now to make my own Thiourea based toner, so look forward to playing games and experimenting with some old prints.

    I am the owner of a copy of your toning book, its the bible of toning. I have ballsed up many a fine print while reading it! I will read with interest the pages you have suggested.

    Thanks again, glad your there.

    Kind Regards

    Stoo
    _____________________________________________

  10. #20

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    213
    so, i finally found out that "hypo" does not mean "hypo clearing agent", but "sodium thiosulfate".
    i was wondering for a long time, why some people mix bleach with fixer and others with hypo. thanks a lot for clearing that up.

    but....
    all the fixers i use don't contain "sodium thiosulfate". they contain "ammonium thiosulfate". is there a difference between those two chemicals when mixing it with potassium ferricyanide? or can i keep using the amm. thios. fixers?

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin