Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,677   Posts: 1,482,053   Online: 870
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    erikg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    pawtucket rhode island usa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,356

    Delta 3200 120 in Pyrocat results

    I thought I'd share the results of some testing I did over the weekend. I'm starting a project that I think Delta 3200 (120 format) would be good for so I ran some tests.
    I shot a roll and cut it in half. I developed one half with Pyrocat, using semistand. I took the times from Ed Buffaloe's site: 1:1:200, 30 min. with 30 sec. agitation at the start and at the 15 minute mark. @ 68 F
    The second half was developed in Ilford DDX, again using the times recommended on unblinkingeye.com: 1:4, 11 min. @ 75 F, standard agitation.
    Both films look pretty good, The DDX negs show a nice fine grain, while the P-cat negs show sharp detail and some evidence of edge effects. In printing, the DDX negs are about one stop denser, but the overall contrast is pretty similar. The P-cat negs show slightly better shadow seperation and seem to be sharper, but they are quite close. This is pretty much as expected. The odd thing is that the P-cat negs show a speckled grain pattern, as if some grains have "clumped up" for lack of a better term. The first two attached files are scans directly from these negs.
    I suspected that this speckled appearence was the result of the stand development so I did an addtional test using Pyrocat in a Jobo ATL processor. 1:1:100, 14 min. @ 75F. These negs did not show the grain speckling, but they do seem to have similar edge effects and sharpness compared to the semi-stand negs. The third file is a scan from one of these negs.
    I also made test prints to see how the grain looks enlarged. I will post thThese are sections from a 12x16 enlargement of each type of neg. The grain in the DDX and the P-cat Jobo negs looks very similar, with the DDX looking a little finer. The grain in the semi-stand is more pronounced, and the speckling gives the print something of a mezotint appearance. Could be interesting in some cases. Edge effects are also in evidence.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails delta3200_DDX.jpg   delta3200_stand.jpg   delta3200_jobo.jpg  

  2. #2
    erikg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    pawtucket rhode island usa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,356

    Delta 3200 print follow up

    Here are the scans of enlargements.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails ilford-DDX.jpg   pcat-semistand.jpg   pcat-jobo.jpg  

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    415
    I tested Delta 3200 in Pyrocat HD and found it to be a nice combo. It stains well. I've ultimately come to the conclusion that I don't like using staining developers with grainy films/films intended to be enlarged enough to show the grain. The grain masking affect of the stain is a little odd looking when the grain is large enough to see, IMHO.

  4. #4
    erikg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    pawtucket rhode island usa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,356
    One more scan that shows the speckled grain and edge effects. This is a section of a 14" wide enlargement from a 6x12 neg. Delta 3200, pyrocat semi-stand development, 1:1:200, 30 min. @ 68F.

    No sharpening was applied to the scan, although it might look it...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails delta3200_pcat_test.jpg  



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin