Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,338   Posts: 1,537,632   Online: 979
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    jeffzeitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    59

    FP4 in a PhotoTherm

    I am setting up a PhotoTherm processer to do cut film. I will be shooting FP4. The instructions are geared to TMax developer and show a development time of 3:30 minutes @ 75 F. I plan on using PyrocatHD in the Glycol base. I checked with PhotoTherm's tech supoort and there is no ploblem with this developer. I questioned them about the seeming low development time for FP4, which is about half of the Ilford recommended time. The gentlemen indicated that it was that the B&W processing is done at 75 F. In the instructions for the PyroCatHD it shows for rotory processing a base development time of 7:15 minutes @ 75 F. I am looking for a correct starting point to develop the FP4. Has any one got experience or insight they can share?

  2. #2
    Jeremy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,767
    Images
    56
    Jeff, I just started using a PhotoTherm processor myself and want to start using Pyrocat-M (the one developed using Metol and specifically created for rotary development). I am currently using the TMax developer diluted 1:4 per PhotoTherm's directions at 3' 30" for FP4 (rated at 64) and it's working great, but would like to get back to Pyrocat so let me know if you do any testing and I'll do the same.
    Let's see what I've got in the magic trash can for Mateo!

    blog
    website

  3. #3
    jeffzeitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    59
    I will be happy to post my findings and tests. In the Phototherm there will be no presoak. I don't know how that will effect things?? I will find out! Also I see that you rate the FP4 at 64 EI and process at the recommended time from Phototherm with FP4 at 125 EI. Did I read that correctly?

  4. #4
    Jeremy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Denton, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,767
    Images
    56
    Quote Originally Posted by jeffzeitlin View Post
    I will find out! Also I see that you rate the FP4 at 64 EI and process at the recommended time from Phototherm with FP4 at 125 EI. Did I read that correctly?
    Yes, I found that the first negatives I shot were too thin for the alt process work I was doing, but that extra stopped just ran the tones up further and gave me the shadow detail I was looking for.
    Let's see what I've got in the magic trash can for Mateo!

    blog
    website



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin