Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,693   Posts: 1,548,966   Online: 800
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Snapshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    913

    It Says "400 ISO" On The Box

    Hi All,

    I've been shooting APX 400 at box speed but the general impression I get is that this film is not a true 400 speed film. Anyone have experience shooting with APX 400 and what speed do you rate this at? I'm thinking 250 to 320 EI.

    In case it matters, the developers I use consists of Rodinal, FX-37 and a pyro-metol TEA developer.
    Last edited by Snapshot; 10-31-2007 at 08:23 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Grammar mistakes... again.
    "The secret to life is to keep your mind full and your bowels empty. Unfortunately, the converse is true for most people."

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,412
    Images
    101
    The reality is that ALL film exhibits different effective ISO's when developed by different people with different developers, and different water supplies (used in mixing developers) worldwide. In the lab, under specific controlled conditions with a specific developer, with specific agitation, films are rated for ISO. Most people get more satisfactory results with b/w films by rating them a bit lower than box ISO.

  3. #3
    Jim Noel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,861
    Blog Entries
    1
    I used to use this with an EI of 200 developed in either D-76 1:1 or HC110 b.
    It definitely is underexposed at 400 with any "regular" developer.
    [FONT=Comic Sans MS]Films NOT Dead - Just getting fixed![/FONT]

  4. #4
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    A film is ISO when it is shot and processed in ISO condition, that's it.

    If you have better results with a different EI in non-ISO condition, I don't think you have a case for Consumer Report...
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Shooter
    Sub 35mm
    Posts
    16,412
    Blog Entries
    2
    hi there

    i am probably speaking like the fool
    but the iso the film is rated has no
    relation to how one should set the iso
    in one's camera. like developing times
    and all that jazz it is just a starting point.
    (if you do that sort of thing yourself)

    i have to admit though when i am sending color
    film or e6 film to the lab - everything comes back
    nice-nice when i use the recommended film speed / box speed.

    maybe it is just a conspiracy?

    john

  6. #6
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Colour films involve tightly controlled processing, therefore there is only a really limited number of actual variations on processing, which explain the successful results coming out of shooting at box speed.

    On the other hand, with B&W you can get usable images through so many different means, that it is why we must understand that ISO ratings are meaningful and accurate only in an ISO situation.

    We all know that using a given developer allows us to shoot at EI #1 and using another developer requires us to shoot at EI #2. There is no trickery here. If you cook a leg of lamb at 225F you can do so in seven hours, but if you cook it at 350F you should be OK at 2h max.

    The standard for ISO film speed involves a particular developer, processing sequence, and measurements. The point is not to have something that is perfectly representative of the average consumer experience, but to have something that is controllable in production circumstances, batch-to-batch consistency among other things.

    If you want to verify the true ISO speed of a film, get a copy of the ISO standard, and do the testing accordingly. Otherwise you're just reflecting the bias of your experimental circumstances.

    Snapshot, none of the developers you are using are part of the ISO standard. Why would you expect your results to match precisely this standard?
    Last edited by Michel Hardy-Vallée; 10-31-2007 at 11:43 PM. Click to view previous post history.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wellington, New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    743
    Images
    28
    Others have already commented on the "true ISO' factor...

    However, I've always shot it at 400 in my folders. I have developed it in Rodinal 1+100 and got very nice results.

    I've also shot Rollei Retro 400 in 35mm (same as APX400) and rated that at 400 too, but this time developed in PC-TEA 1+50. Once again, nice negatives.

  8. #8
    ann
    ann is online now

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,879
    Images
    26
    in our school situation the students may use 160 to 400. Each student test for specific EI and as you can see it varies.

    With my 35mm nikons, one i rate the film at 160 the other 250.

    with roll film 200, sheet film 160, and this is all ilford hp5+, so as others have suggested the speed will vary with a variety of situations.
    http://www.aclancyphotography.com

  9. #9
    Snapshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    913
    Everyone is confirming what I'm seeing with APX 400. Unfortunately, my metering skills were off due to years of relying on digital automation. As a result, I was getting inconclusive results. Just plain laziness on my part.
    Last edited by Snapshot; 11-01-2007 at 08:28 AM. Click to view previous post history.
    "The secret to life is to keep your mind full and your bowels empty. Unfortunately, the converse is true for most people."

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Phoeinx Arizona
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Snapshot View Post
    Hi All,

    I've been shooting APX 400 at box speed but the general impression I get is that this film is not a true 400 speed film. Anyone have experience shooting with APX 400 and what speed do you rate this at? I'm thinking 250 to 320 EI.

    In case it matters, the developers I use consists of Rodinal, FX-37 and a pyro-metol TEA developer.
    I just bought 50 rolls from Freestyle as my "shoot around film", after testing with my Sigma SA 9 I rate it at 320 for Edwal 12, 200 for Microdal X, and 400 for DK50. I would have thought that it would test out at 400 for Rodinal as well, but I am using up all of my old stock so I have not test with Rodinal.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin