Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,699   Posts: 1,549,144   Online: 1132
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    fatboy22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Iowa City, IA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    342
    Images
    63

    Anybody ever tried TMAX400 in Microdol-X?

    I recently found a old can of Microdol-x. I want to try it on a roll of 120 TMAX400. I was just wondering if anybody here had tried that combination before? What might I expect? Do most people use it undiluted or is there a prefered dilution 1:1, 1:3? I will be running it in my JOBO.
    Keep Film Alive, Shoot Everyday!
    JamiesInfraredPhotography.com

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Southern California
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,879
    Images
    11
    Quote Originally Posted by fatboy22 View Post
    I recently found a old can of Microdol-x. I want to try it on a roll of 120 TMAX400. I was just wondering if anybody here had tried that combination before? What might I expect? Do most people use it undiluted or is there a prefered dilution 1:1, 1:3? I will be running it in my JOBO.
    http://www.kodak.com/global/en/profe...17.14.10&lc=en

    Kodak posts small tank developing info for New Tmax 400 and Microdol-X undiluted and Microdol-X diuted 3:1. For developing with the Jobo (continuous agitation ??) you would need to test.
    Tom Hoskinson
    ______________________________

    Everything is analog - even digital :D

  3. #3
    Lee L's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,244
    I tried TMY in Perceptol 1:3 about a year ago, but haven't had time to print yet. I took Barry Thornton's advice of shooting at EI 200 and cutting development time by 10% (from his book The Edge of Darkness). But I also went to semi-stand and extended the time appropriately, so that's the opposite direction from the one you're headed. The negatives look very good, perhaps overdeveloped a hair, but that could be my semi-stand adjustments being off a bit. Thornton was after greatest perceived sharpness, better shadow detail, and less apparent grain.

    Microdol-X is a close equivalent of Perceptol, so the advice to shoot at EI 200 and cut development 10% from manufacturer's recommendations with TMY would still apply. You'd normally need to back off a bit more for constant rotary agitation, although with the Jobo and the 5 minute pre-soak now recommended, you might be pretty close at just the 10% reduction in time.

    I didn't shoot any densitometry test frames on the film I shot, so can't give you numbers.

    Lee

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Hawaii
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    716
    Recently I've done a good amount of TMX in Microdol-X, 1:0 and rated at 64. Its a decently close look to the classic Panatomic-X in Microdol-X, very close.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin