Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,688   Posts: 1,482,358   Online: 771
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    mikepry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Salem, Wi (By Milwaukee)
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    412
    Images
    39

    Film to Developer Ratio

    I was wondering if there is any difference/effect on film if one develops say a roll of film with 12 frames in 350ml of chemistry versus a roll of 36 frames in the same ammount of chemistry? I am bulk loading and wanted to do smaller rolls and was wondering if there would be a different exhaustion rate, etc. As always, thanks in advance for any info on this matter!

    Mike
    "EVERY film and paper is good .......... for something"
    Phil Davis

  2. #2
    Dave Miller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Middle England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,894
    Images
    2
    Unless you use very dilute developer the answer is no.
    Regards Dave.

    An English Eye


  3. #3
    fhovie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Port Hueneme, California - USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,246
    Images
    92
    It kind of depends on the developer you use. If you are using anything off the shelf (D76, XTOL etc) full strength, no problem. If you are using a weak staining developer it is a little different. Some developers need at least 500ml per 8x10 area of film. A "roll" of film is usually considered one 8x10. I believe 24 exposures of 35mm is likely less than that and 36 exposures possibly slightly more. Hand tanks usually need 500ml to cover the spool so you are always covered there on developing agent needed for the quantity of film. Even D-76 or XTOL at 1:3 might need more than 350ml for one shot use. I would look it up for the developer you are using if you are not using it full strength or 1:1.
    My photos are always without all that distracting color ...

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    Quote Originally Posted by fhovie View Post
    Hand tanks usually need 500ml to cover the spool so you are always covered there
    Not true of 35mm film. I've got four tanks, two stainless steel and two plastic. With the stainless tanks, I use 250ml per roll, which provides some margin for error (225 would probably cover, but just barely). With one plastic tank (an unusual Russian design), 250ml also covers one roll, but with less margin. With the other plastic tank (an AP design), IIRC 325ml is recommended, but I always use 350ml because it's easier to measure.

    With most of these tanks, 500ml will cover two rolls of 35mm film or one roll of medium format film. I believe the AP tank requires a bit more than this for 2x35mm or MF, but I don't recall the precise value.

    I've never had a problem I could attribute to too little developing agent when using 250ml per 35mm roll. I've used Rodinal 1+25 and 1+50, D-76 1+1 through 1+4, XTOL 1+1 (and a roll or two at 1+2), PC-Glycol 1+49, DS-10 1+1, and DS-12 2+1. These are all pretty conventional developers (PC-Glycol, DS-10, and DS-12 are home-brew formulas, but they're fairly conventional in design even if they aren't commonly used.) PC-Glycol is probably the oddest of them, and I believe it's got the lowest concentration of developing agents. It's never given me unexpectedly thin negatives, although I've had to test to find appropriate developing times for it with most films, and I'm sure I've gotten thin negatives from underdeveloping when doing such tests.

  5. #5
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,872
    Images
    210
    Paterson tank takes 500ml for 1 120/220 roll, 600ml for 2 35mm, i think technically it's 290ml for 1 roll of 35mm but i prefer round numbers so i do 300ml per 35mm roll.
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Northern Aquitaine
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    4,913
    A couple of thought-experiments are useful here.

    1: How much dev is there for a 4x5 inch Polaroid?

    2: Consider a 2-bath dev. All the developing agent is normally in bath A. Soak in bath A. Pour out bath A. How much is left behind? Less than 25ml/film, and much of that is wetting the tank, not imbibed in the emulsion. Add bath B, which is activator only... The amount of developing agent per film is minute.

    Most of the dev you use is to wet the film quickly and evenly. Unless it oxidizes during the course of development (e.g. PMK) there's always plenty.

    I am aware of the Xtol anomaly and wrote to the designers for illumination. They replied, but I fear the answer was not illuminating. It may be that I failed to understand it, but I think it more likely that they did not answer the question.

    Cheers,

    R.
    Free Photography Information on My Website
    http://www.rogerandfrances.com



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin