Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,302   Posts: 1,536,177   Online: 673
      
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 44

Thread: X-TOL question

  1. #21
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,044
    Images
    38
    Quote Originally Posted by PHOTOTONE View Post
    How long do you feel it lasts in a deep tank? Not quantity of film processed, but length of time in the tank.
    I mix about every month and a half. I use a 6 inch plastic tube that is 2 feet tall. I float a tight fitting plastic lid on it and then put another lid over the top. I have never experienced the sudden death syndrom but I do find that not all films follow the extension guide line the same. I keep a running log on the wall of every film and temp and time and roll number. Then refer to that with every batch. I find that FP4 in particular gets reluctant to develop after awhile and I have to extend the times for it far more than for Kodak films. I am finding that ACROS also needs greater time extension than Kodak films as the developer exhausts. FP4 and ACROS print really nicely though regardless.

  2. #22

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    48
    Images
    9
    Question for Dennis. I have seen your prints and admire them. As I am just starting to use 120 film and searching for a film/developer combination, I was wondering if you had any favorites using the Xtol. You have seen all types of film I am sure. I am just starting with 120 as I memtioned, and would really appreciate any input. I mostly shoot landscape.

  3. #23

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by dpurdy View Post
    I have never experienced the sudden death syndrom [sic] but I do find that not all films follow the extension guide line the same.
    I got hit with this for the first time a couple weeks ago. I mix up a 5L XTOL kit and put it into 5 1L datatainers. I dilute 1:1 and throw it away after the first use (this works fine for 6 4x5 negatives in 270mL of the dilute solution).

    When I got zapped I was switching to a new bottle of XTOL at the same time as I switched from TMAX-100 to TMAX-400. It took me about 3 batches of film (the second two being test exposures after the first 6 sheets were ruined) to realize that the problem was the developer not my developing time. The bottle was completely full and closed tightly (though apparently not as tightly as I thought) but was mixed 5 months earlier. The next bottle I grabbed (mixed at same time) works fine.

    I'm now entertaining thoughts of a switch in developers.

  4. #24
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,044
    Images
    38
    is there a possibility that one bottle was contaminated? I was of the impression that the sudden death syndrome was fixed when kodak went to non paper packaging for part A. Somehow it doesn't make sense to me that you mixed up the whole bag and then divided it into 5 parts and one of the parts died but the rest did not. Or did you divide the powders first into five parts and then mix? I am pretty sure you wouldn't do that.

  5. #25
    Snapshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    912
    I was an XTOL user and found that 1:1 dilution produced excellent results. I didn't reuse or replenish, as tracking how much extra time was needed for each roll was more hassle than it's worth. I generally didn't use XTOL enough to worry about economy. Since then, however, my processing requirements have risen dramatically but I've opted to use actuance developers. As a result, XTOL is no longer part of my arsenal.
    "The secret to life is to keep your mind full and your bowels empty. Unfortunately, the converse is true for most people."

  6. #26

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by dpurdy View Post
    is there a possibility that one bottle was contaminated? I was of the impression that the sudden death syndrome was fixed when kodak went to non paper packaging for part A. Somehow it doesn't make sense to me that you mixed up the whole bag and then divided it into 5 parts and one of the parts died but the rest did not. Or did you divide the powders first into five parts and then mix? I am pretty sure you wouldn't do that.
    I mixed the entire 5L in a bucket at once, then portioned it into the 5 bottles, all of which had been used for developer at least 2 times previously and never for anything else. I can't for the life of me figure out how one would get contaminated, unless it was a matter of an imperfect seal on the bottle itself.

    The resulting negatives were almost completely clear, with only the brightest highlights (zone VIII and up) being visible.

  7. #27

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Snapshot View Post
    I was an XTOL user and found that 1:1 dilution produced excellent results. I didn't reuse or replenish, as tracking how much extra time was needed for each roll was more hassle than it's worth. I generally didn't use XTOL enough to worry about economy. Since then, however, my processing requirements have risen dramatically but I've opted to use actuance developers. As a result, XTOL is no longer part of my arsenal.

    X-Tol can be an accutance dev if you dilute 1+3.

  8. #28
    Snapshot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    912
    Quote Originally Posted by jim appleyard View Post
    X-Tol can be an accutance dev if you dilute 1+3.
    True, at 1+3 dilution XTOL is quite sharp and turns out great negatives. However, I'm finding that FX-37 and Rodinal are giving me my desired results without risk of sudden death and the extra consideration of having to mix up 5 litres of developer. Still, I wouldn't hesitate to use it.
    "The secret to life is to keep your mind full and your bowels empty. Unfortunately, the converse is true for most people."

  9. #29

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,067
    I'm a big fan of Xtol. I tried it when it first came out and haven't even thought of switching since.

    I use it one shot 1:1 through 1:3, although have a client who exposes Delta 3200 at EI 12,800 and I use stock for that. Love the dev. Sharper and less grain than D-76 and, I think it gives me smoother tonality. It's a great all round developer.

    The only other one I use is Rodinal when I have images that just need that special Rodinal look.

    I can't explain what happened with edebill and the sudden death. I know it'll drive me nuts all weekend. But then I really do need to get a life!!

  10. #30
    RoBBo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    255
    Images
    8
    I only use straight when doing 'large' sheet film (8x10 or 11x14) because when I started, I was doing them tray, 1 at a time, and the longer times were killing me.
    Now I use a jobo, but having five 8x10 sheets in one tube make me worry about the dev dying on me if I don't use stock. When I used trays, I re-used it in the tray til I had finished at least 6 sheets of 11x14. Can't remember exactly how much chem I used though?

    I never re-use it when I'm doing roll film, as it's diluted, and I feel like it would exhaust sooner, though I can't really back that up.
    I will say I love this stuff more than almost anything.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin