Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,452   Posts: 1,570,235   Online: 1105
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Paper problem?

  1. #1
    DAK
    DAK is offline

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    39
    Images
    8

    Paper problem?

    I am suddenly finding that I have light and dark zones on my contact sheets that run parallel with the long side of the paper. They are not sharply delineated. So I started running tests without the negatives. The striations appear on RC VC paper from three different packs from the same company and they are all oriented in the same way no matter how I orient the paper under the enlarger. A piece of fiber paper from another company did not show the striations. Any answers or questions? Dave

  2. #2
    DylanCraver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    san diego
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    25
    Curious to see an example... have you any scans? That might be helpful.

    Quite obviously it is something in your enlarger, but I'm not sure why it only affected RC and not FB.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    38
    sounds like poo paper!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    I've had that happen with some very outdated Kodak Polymax RC. How old is the paper and how was it stored? It might have gone bad.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    I vaguely recall hearing that exposure to X-rays can create banding similar to what you describe, but I'm not 100% positive of that and I don't have a reference handy. Might the paper have been taken through an airport X-ray machine?

  6. #6
    dpurdy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Portland OR USA
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    2,064
    Images
    38
    I had the same problem on some old positive to positve dupe film. It picked up density bands.

  7. #7
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,784
    Speculation won't get you "a packet of ketchup at the cheapest restaurant in the universe".


    This sounds allot like a safelight problem, but IDK. Run a safelight check on your set up. It's a good idea to do this every so often, especially when you bring a new paper in to the darkroom. Safelight problems are the cause of more crappy printing than all other things combined. There are allot of threads in the archives that will tell you how to do this. Use the method that involves preflashing your paper. One paper may have a problem with your safelight, another may not, so just because one kind of paper has no problem, doesn't mean anything.

    No safelight problem? Take a sheet of the offending paper, and process it directly, in the dark, without exposing it, if the artifact is still there, it is the paper. If it isn't there, give another sheet a bit of a flash, just enough to get it started grey (no image) and process that (because some things need a baseline exposure to show up), and so on, until you eliminate enough variables that you know what is going on, otherwise, you are just milking the guppy.
    Last edited by JBrunner; 01-03-2008 at 02:53 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  8. #8
    DAK
    DAK is offline

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    39
    Images
    8
    Thanks for the thoughts. I had discounted an enlarger problem when I found that the bands of dark and light maintained the same orientation on the paper even though the paper's orientation to the enlarger changed. The paper, since I've had it, has not been exposed to x-ray. I have stored it in the dark room, but these are small packs of paper, one 25 sheets and two others at 40 sheets, and so they weren't in the dark room for very long. I do no toning in the darkroom. Two of the packs were promotional packs and I wonder if the paper might have been a little old. I contacted Ilford's tech support with an e-mail and have heard nothing yet.

  9. #9
    DAK
    DAK is offline

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    39
    Images
    8
    While doing my last post, Jason came on to make some suggestions. I have processed a sheet of unexposed paper and it came out pure white. If I flash the paper, how short should the flash be? I doubt if it's a safelight problem, but I will test. Dave

  10. #10
    JBrunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,784
    Quote Originally Posted by DAK View Post
    While doing my last post, Jason came on to make some suggestions. I have processed a sheet of unexposed paper and it came out pure white. If I flash the paper, how short should the flash be? I doubt if it's a safelight problem, but I will test. Dave
    Just a super quick blip of room uniform room light should do. (you want to fog it, not white, and not black) When you process it, you want it to come out fogged, and see if the pattern shows up. Don't use your enlarger. If it comes out a nice even foggy shade of grey, your problem isn't the paper.
    Last edited by JBrunner; 01-03-2008 at 11:47 AM. Click to view previous post history.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin