Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,729   Posts: 1,515,237   Online: 820
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 11 of 11
  1. #11
    Photo Engineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rochester, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    22,867
    Images
    65

    Curve relationships

    One of the few things that I still have from EK is a curve that I hand drew of film, paper and a print. The only comment I can add is that the paper curve is drawn just a bit on the underexposed side or too far left. And, the print curve should match the paper curve at some meaningful density rather than being arbitrary as it is here.

    Also, the print curve toe and shoulder are sharper than they would be in real-life due to the multiplication factor of the lower contrasts. So, in the toe of the paper, where contrast might be 0.1 and the film is 0.6, then the print will be 0.06 and this is how we lose detail. I did not show that.

    You can see the latitude of the paper (at 2.5) can delineate the possible latitude of the film that can be expressed in the print of that film. Sliding the paper curve back and forth on the film curve is equivalent to changing the exposure. Left is underexposure and right is overexposure. The total film curve is not shown in this example.

    PE
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails film-paper-print curves.jpg  

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin