Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,953   Posts: 1,558,015   Online: 1127
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2

    tri-x rated at 200 asa

    Hello to the group.

    I just shot a couple of rolls of tri-x at 200
    I did this as it was suggested to achieve
    a different look from tri-x. Basically I'm trying to tone down
    the contrast a bit. Apparantly this is common practice.
    However, I won't be able to process these rolls myself.

    My question is, if I take these rolls to my favorite lab,
    do I ask for a pull process, or process normal?

    I'm inclined to pull, but I want to check here before
    I might ruin a couple of good shots.

    Sorry if this has been covered. I tried a search on this.

    SG

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    129
    Shoot at 200, process normally. You should get nice looking negs.

  3. #3
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,391
    Images
    299
    If you want to lower contrast in your negatives, develop for a shorter period of time.
    Shooting the film at an exposure index of 200 just means you're giving more exposure, moving the shadow tones farther up from the toe of the tonal curve of the film (see manufacturer's data sheet).
    What it in reality means is that you'll get better shadow separation, but overall contrast shouldn't be affected until you alter development time.
    If you develop that roll normal you will probably get workable negs unless it was extremely bright and you metered for the shadows. If it was low contrast lighting you should be fine. But to achieve a compressed tonal scale, or lowered contrast, you need to shorten development time. How much? Only trial and error can tell for sure.
    - Thomas
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    813
    Images
    9
    Yes, rating at 200 and shortening the dev time would be a "pull".

    Generally, pulling lowers contrast...but you could develop normally as well and get great negatives. That extra stop of exposure is easily handled by negative film.

  5. #5
    Aurelien's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Limoges, France
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    669
    Images
    96
    10 minutes in Calbe A49 1-1 @ 24°C. Try, you will be surprised
    Aurelien, Analog Photographer

    the analog place to be

  6. #6
    tac
    tac is offline

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Appalachia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    246
    Normal works great, but I would still pull it 10-15%.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    New York City & Pontremoli, Italy
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    546
    I shoot all of my 35mm tri-x at e.i. 200; I process in Microdol-X 1:3 (24C) for 20% less that the published time. Works for me.

  8. #8
    gandolfi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Denmark
    Shooter
    Large Format Pan
    Posts
    1,804
    Images
    370
    my favourite setting!

    200iso - develop 4 min (or as I do 3.45min) in HC110. fantastic film!

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    861
    I use to shoot it that way, then pull process. The result was less contrast, which could allow a softer look to the final images. Oddly enough, I recall a Kodak magazine ad that described that, and had an image that was of a pilot with a WWI era biplane. I liked the look in that old ad, so I gave it a try for a while. It may have been in a National Geographic magazine, since I recall going through old issues at the library when I was in college (graduated 1998). Anyway, probably appropriate for doing shots of people, though I prefer AGFA APX100, or more recently Ilford HP5+.

    Ciao!

    Gordon Moat Photography

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Winnipeg, MB, Canada
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    830
    Quote Originally Posted by gandolfi View Post
    my favourite setting!

    200iso - develop 4 min (or as I do 3.45min) in HC110. fantastic film!
    I did a roll @ 200 last summer, but I did HC-110 dil. B, develop 5 min (agitation 10 secs/min throughout). I consider "normal" 400 ISO development to be HC-110 Dil. B. at 7.5 min, so I did pull it.

    Decent results (for me, anyway) such as the attached.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails img021-mod4-flip-web.jpg  
    i can't wait to take a picture of my thumb with this beautiful camera.

    - phirehouse, after buying a camera in the classifieds

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin