Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,713   Posts: 1,483,018   Online: 667
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684

    Slavich SW Handling Characteristics?

    Proofing of a vast number of negatives has
    gotten under way. I had in mind using Graded
    RC but soured on it right away because of it's
    stiffness and slick feel. FB is really my paper.

    Now I've not used SW in many, many a year
    and am glad to see it on the market once
    again. For assurance I thought I'd inquire.
    Any problems?

    I proof full frame 2 up on 5x7; 2 exposures
    same negative for ballpark exposure and
    content evaluation. Dan

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,412
    Images
    101
    People have been proofing on SW paper for 100 years. I don't see any problems, other than the fact that SW paper is flimsy and is harder to transfer between solutions and in the wash, harder to keep multiple prints separated.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    153
    I've been using the Slavich SW paper for a couple of months now, and enjoy its look and feel. I've got a bunch of 12x18" paper, and find the best way of processing it is in a single tray, pouring the chemicals off in succession into jugs. Works fine. It dries with a bit of a curl, but nothing the dry mount press won't take care of. I think it would really shine dry-mounted, as a matter of fact. I've not done it yet, but plan on it.

    It's nice stuff - it really bounces around in selenium, from my limited experimenting. Goes a nice brown / red.

    I think if you were to print 5x7, you could safely process it in a line of trays without worrying too much about creasing the paper.

    Good luck,

  4. #4
    Alex Hawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Kansas, USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,895
    Images
    63
    Once I got used to the feel of single weight paper, I preferred using it and still do. One does have to be a bit more gentle with it than double weight, but that's all part of the acclimation process. If you use a squeegee on your prints, go lightly with it. That's been the main place where I've had trouble making creases.
    Semper Fi & God Bless America
    My Photography Blog

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Alex Hawley View Post
    If you use a squeegee on your prints, go lightly with it.
    That's been the main place where I've had trouble
    making creases.
    Try sponge drying. That's what I use. Never have used
    a squeegee but think a sponge must draw more water.
    Photo grade sponges are available in a few sizes.
    Wring near dry and draw slowly, both sides.
    No water here or there to wipe up. Keep
    just for the purpose. Dan

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Marco Buonocore View Post
    I've got a bunch of 12x18" paper, and find the best way
    of processing it is in a single tray, pouring the chemicals
    off in succession into jugs. Works fine.
    I also process single tray though do it as some do
    drum processing, one-shot using very dilute chemistry.
    A little more time consuming but very space saving.
    Allows one to skip the stop and with the very
    dilute fix dissolved silver levels are very low.

    After the fix I hold in a tray using non-woven separator
    sheets. So no bunching up of prints. The hold plus two
    transfers with fresh water clears that very dilute fix.
    The last soak is overnight. Prints are twelve to
    sixteen hours wet. No problems. Dan

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Pasadena, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    813
    Images
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by dancqu View Post
    I also process single tray though do it as some do
    drum processing, one-shot using very dilute chemistry.
    A little more time consuming but very space saving.
    Allows one to skip the stop and with the very
    dilute fix dissolved silver levels are very low.

    After the fix I hold in a tray using non-woven separator
    sheets. So no bunching up of prints. The hold plus two
    transfers with fresh water clears that very dilute fix.
    The last soak is overnight. Prints are twelve to
    sixteen hours wet. No problems. Dan
    Is your fixing adequate? What dilution do you use and what type of fixer?

    I'm curious because I've never heard of anyone using a dilute fixer...

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Phoeinx Arizona
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,343
    I really like SW, Salvich has become my standard paper, washes faster, drys faster and flat, spots, tones and mounts well. I use 3 trays, both roatery and archival washers.

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Van Buren, Arkansas
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    2,412
    Images
    101
    Ah, you youngsters. I remember back when I worked in a wedding and portrait photographers darkroom in the late 1960's. My job was to make a B&W SW Kodak Panalure print of each and every medium-format C-22 color negative he shot of Bridals and Engagement settings. I would have 50 to 100 photos to expose, process, wash and dry every night. We had a big floor model Pako stainless steel rotary drum print washer, and a big 22" wide electric Pako rotary glossy ferrotype surface print dryer. I had no trouble with multiple SW sheets of paper. Of course, since these shots were pre-cropped in the camera, and his exposure was very consistent, I could expose quite few, put them into a holding box, then process a "batch" at once.

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    [QUOTES=PVia;579621]
    "Is your fixing adequate? What dilution do
    you use and what type of fixer?"

    I've checked my processing using the ST-1 and HT-2 tests.
    The ST-1 tests for any residual silver left in the emulsion and
    the HT-2 tests for residual fixer left in the emulsion. The ST-1
    uses a sulfur compound to test for silver and the HT-2 test
    uses a silver compound to test for sulfur. Sulfur is a
    component of fixer. Simple tests.

    With 120, one roll, I'd use 20ml of rapid fix concentrate in
    a volume total of 500ml; 1:24. Most any rapid fixer concentrate
    should do and that for any of the ISO 125 and less films. I've not
    tested high speed film; they contain more silver.

    With paper very dilute is a more complicated matter.
    Upon testing I found quite a variance among them in
    the amount of chemistry needed. Slavich took the
    least amount. From tests it would appear that
    Slavich does not need a bromided developer.

    "I'm curious because I've never heard of
    anyone using a dilute fixer..."

    I'd never heard of it either then read of a quarter
    strength fix used by Eddie Ephraums; author and much
    respected photographer. I was intent upon finding the
    least quantity of chemistry needed to thoroughly
    clear a film or a print of fixer. Now I process
    film and paper all solutions one-shot.

    No stops of any sort, fresh chemistry each film or print,
    extremely low silver levels in the fixer, and easy least
    water washes. Dan



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin