Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,573   Posts: 1,545,677   Online: 857
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    juan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    St. Simons Island, Georgia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,641
    Images
    4
    While cleaning out my refrigerator, I found, stuck far in the back, bottles of Formulary "BW 65" paper developer. I can't remember when I bought it (Hey, leave me alone. I'm a single guy. At least is wasn't a Fresca.)
    It's a two part liquid developer that claims to give results similar to Amidol. Has anyone used this stuff with Azo (the old Rochester stuff)?
    j

  2. #2
    fhovie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Port Hueneme, California - USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,247
    Images
    92
    I have been using this for about 6 months. It is Glycin based and it seems to adhere to the photoformulary description pretty close. It is contrastier when strong and softer when weak. It has about an 8 hour tray life and about 20 8x10s per liter. I use it only for fiber and an now using it as a 2 bath. (Thanks Les) one bath at about 1:1:3 and another bath at 1:1:8. Read Les's article. This produces the best results for me so far.
    Frank
    My photos are always without all that distracting color ...

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963
    yes, i've used the bw-65 with azo. it gives a much cooler tone than Michael Smith's amidol formula and the tonal range is not as good. I would use it with a neutral tone enlarging paper to get really black blacks. but it does nothing exceptional, or even particularly good, with azo.
    Tom

  4. #4
    c6h6o3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    3,179
    Images
    6
    I've used it. It's more like Dektol than amidol. I've not printed anything except Azo in amidol, but with that paper there is simply no substitute for it. An awful lot of money and sheets of Azo have been wasted trying to disprove that fact.
    Jim



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin