Discussions: 43,724 | Messages: 589,095 | Members: 28,923 | Online: 247 | Chatroom: 0
User Name:  Password:
 

"That is called grain. It is supposed to be there." -Flotsam


 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE
Customize Sidebar
Gum-Silver Process
Author: Dwane
217 view(s)
Kodak D-19
Author: Tom Hoskinson
240 view(s)
Recognize this HCA recipe?
Author: craigclu
446 view(s)
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry > ATP [new TechPan]

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2008, 06:06 AM   #81 (permalink)
 
Wishy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 75
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kram View Post
Wishy, if my photos were any good maybe.
I meant a roll of the film + one bottle of dev for some other film?
Wishy is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-11-2008, 01:41 PM   #82 (permalink)
 
kram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Default

Yep that's the photo. I will try and put some sections on.

Wishy got any Adox CMS 20?

Wolf - can't find anyone in the UK that does the 140ml bottles.
kram is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-11-2008, 03:52 PM   #83 (permalink)
 
kram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Default

Keith - blow ups now on Flickr - note original 8x12 print scanned on canon 8400f.
I find that the way I developed the film, gives well rounded contrast. Pan F plus at 32ASA on a bright day is too contrasty for me, OK at 40ASA, but I feel should be shot at 50ASA. However, on a British overcast day (in winter!) 32ASA might be the right ASA (well for the process I use).

If you really want to see another photo - and it's of the same roll of film, but completely different subject, it's has a person in it (+ this one will have examples of under developement down one edge). Just ask - but I won't put as many blow ups on, it take ages.
kram is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-14-2008, 10:52 AM   #84 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: East Rutherford, NJ
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by titrisol View Post
My 1st impressions after shooting in a Nikon FE Micro Nikkor 55/2.8 and developing in the special developer 1+15 for 8 minutes:
Just wondering how you got that development time. Maybe I'm just dense but the tech sheet only gives dilutions and times for RHC, RHS, RLC developers. The included developer seems to be similar to SPUR Technospeed correct. I'm honestly a little confused. Maybe someone could lend a helping hand. Also, the tech sheet states that no stop bath should be used. Should I use a water stop or avoid stopping entirely? Thanks in advance...
j4425 is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 05-14-2008, 01:47 PM   #85 (permalink)
 
kram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 69
Default

I didn't use any stop. Just straight to the fixer.

Wolf - I take that the roll film will be 120, or will there be 220. I know a few people miss the 220 rolls.
kram is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)


APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)
 

  Contact Us - Advertise on APUG - Archive - Top - Site Terms - Forum Rules  
    

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.
  
All Content Copyright © 2002-2008 Photocentric Ltd.   Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO APUG.ORG is a division of Photocentric Ltd.
This site is best viewed with a resolution of 1280x1024 (or higher), we recommend using