Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,767   Posts: 1,516,485   Online: 923
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69

    Ilford Microphen and high ISOs

    Is Microphen the only chemical recommended to develop
    film of high ISOs such as pushed HP5+ beyond 800 and
    Delta 3200?

    The reason I ask is because I very rarely shoot at those speeds
    which means I rarely need to use that chemical which means
    every box is often one-use as it would be dead by the time I
    needed it again.

    Right now for example I have three rolls of 120 Delta 3200 to
    develop but I am reluctant to use my only box of Microphen
    as its hard to get around here.

    Any "open-source" recipes I can mix up myself?
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Shooter
    8x10 Format
    Posts
    306
    Arigram,
    I push HP5+ to 1600 and develope in ID11 the times are in the box. the only time I used Delta 3200 I rated it at 1600 and used ID11 to develope.
    I know others will tell you it should not be done but I have successfuly split a 5 litre pack of ID11 into 1 litre mixes by weighing out the two powders and splitting them into 5 parcels, mixing up each parcel as I needed it without any descernable ill effects.
    Could you split your box of microphen so that you only mix the amount you need to develope the three films you have, and keep the rest in powder form.
    If you mixed up half the powder from a 1 litre box and used it 1+3 it would give you 2 litres of working strength developer which if used one shot at 600ml per film would only waste 200ml of dev.

    I know I am a tight arse and the purists here will diagree with me but I hate waste and have found this system works for me.

    Regards Paul.

  3. #3
    johnnywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,255
    Images
    78
    I often do the same as Paul, with no bad effects. I just make sure the powder is well stirred before taking the amount I need.
    As has been mentioned a lot, if you used an iso of 3200 to expose the film, use the time for 6400 to develope it.
    If I had been present at the creation, I would have given some useful hints for the better arrangement of the Universe.
    Alfonso the Wise, 1221-1284

  4. #4
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,172
    Images
    148
    Ari, the Ilford ID-68 formula was published by Ilford by themselves as being similar to Microphen. It is and works identically.

    Ian

  5. #5
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69
    Ok, great!
    Thank you guys!
    (now I only need to find some more Delta 3200s
    as those three were all I had -and expired in 2006)
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  6. #6
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,154
    Images
    288
    I know I'm late in the game, but Ilfotec DD-X works really well pushing the Delta 3200 to 3200. I've also used Tri-X at 1600 with a surprising amount of shadow detail. So if you can get DD-X, it's the cat's meow.


    - Thomas
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  7. #7
    arigram's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Crete, Greece
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    5,474
    Images
    69
    How about D-76?
    DD-X and ID11 is hard to find...
    aristotelis grammatikakis
    www.arigram.gr
    Real photographs, created in camera, 100% organic,
    no digital additives and shit




  8. #8
    johnnywalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    British Columbia, Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,255
    Images
    78
    I've used id-11 with delta 3200 with good results, but as I said earlier using the times for 1 stop faster than Ilford suggests. Apparently id-11 and d-76 are pretty much the same.
    If I had been present at the creation, I would have given some useful hints for the better arrangement of the Universe.
    Alfonso the Wise, 1221-1284

  9. #9
    Thomas Bertilsson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    14,154
    Images
    288
    A friend of mine used to be the master printer at a pro lab here in Minneapolis. I have a lot of respect for his skills and his favorite film developer was D76, especially for pushing. If you want 3200 speed out of Delta 3200 it's almost a two stop push, but I'm sure it can be done.
    I have no idea how it looks, but I do know that negs developed in D76 print very easily for me. I don't use it myself, but other people I print for do, and the results are great. If you can get D76 - use it! It's hard to beat.
    - Thomas
    "Often moments come looking for us". - Robert Frank

    "Make good art!" - Neil Gaiman

    "...the heart and mind are the true lens of the camera". - Yousuf Karsh

  10. #10
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,172
    Images
    148
    Thomas, ID-68 is actually far better for push processing, it evolved from ID-11 (which is D76), first Ilford tried a PQ version of ID-11/D76 which is incorrectly said to be Microphen in the Darkroom Cookbook. The PQ variant of ID-11 was first published by Ilford in 1954, a little later the formula was adjusted to give improved performance, ID-68, and has been sold commercially ever since as Microphen.

    A PQ variant of an MQ developer is slightly more active and usually gives approx half a stop more film speed, they are also slightly cleaner working which helps when you are push processing.

    Ian

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin