Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,665   Posts: 1,481,686   Online: 755
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,348
    Images
    132
    Tabular for TMAX and Epitaxial for Delta, did I get it right?
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  2. #12
    23mjm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Rocklin, California
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    450
    Images
    9
    TASTE GREAT-----------------------------------------------------------------LESS FILLING

  3. #13
    Graham.b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Swindon,,,,,,UK
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    197
    Images
    22
    I have to go go with Kodak, i have had many a better result, as pointed a very smooth finish, and on Kentmere K,
    great finish, IMHO any way.

    Graham

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    171
    Quote Originally Posted by mhv View Post
    Tabular for TMAX and Epitaxial for Delta, did I get it right?
    i thought both were tabular?

  5. #15
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,079
    Images
    20
    Spectral sensitivity is definitely different. Delta looks more like a traditional B&W film, and TMax looks more like B&W video in this regard.

    Personally, I prefer Delta 400 to TMax 400, but I like TMax 100 (because it's so sharp) better than Delta 100 (because the tonality is kind of bottom heavy to my eye), that is when I'm not using Tri-X or Efke 100 or FP-4+, which are my main films of late. If Delta 400 were available in sheet sizes, I'd use a lot more of it.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,101
    Images
    9
    Tmax have better reciprocity characteristics than Delta films. Even so, the only film of the bunch that I have used to any extent is Delta 100.

  7. #17
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,348
    Images
    132
    Quote Originally Posted by cotdt View Post
    i thought both were tabular?
    Best thread I could find on the subject:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum205/...itization.html

    Actually, if I understand correctly, you could have epitaxy on either a cubic or a tabular grain.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin