Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,499   Posts: 1,543,219   Online: 1056
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Thessaloniki, Greece
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    17

    TRI X 400 PUSH 1600 (DEVELOPER? T MAX, D76, RODINAL...)

    Hi
    I want to push Tri x 400 to 1600 ASA. Which developer would you prefer? Time of develop.? agitation?

    thank you

  2. #2
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,264
    Images
    148
    I guess I'd use Tmax developer or better still Xtol, Kodak publish their recommendations on the internet here

    Ian

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Eastern Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,595
    Google and save "The Massive Development Chart".
    I like it done with D-76.

  4. #4
    sterioma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Italy
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    259
    Images
    22
    I have tried with both Microphen and D-76. I generally liked the Microphen results better in terms of shadow detail.

    Here are my times:

    Microphen: stock (1:0), 12 minutes at 20°C. 30 secs initial then 2 gentle inversions every other minute.
    D-76: stock (1:0) 9.5 minutes at 20°C. 30 secs initial agitation then 2 gentle inversion every minute.

    I have attached a sample with D-76. I don't have Microphen scans right now, but I can certainly make one if you are interested.

    Good luck!

    Stefano
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Kodak_TriX_Dec2005_0011.jpg  
    Stefano Ricciardi
    My photos on Flickr

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,055
    I prefer Acufine for this, but there are many choices.

  6. #6
    Stephanie Brim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Iowa
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,607
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    21
    Rodinal is fun. D76 works. HC-110 is next on my list to try. I have times for Dilution B.
    No idea what's going to happen next, but I'm hoping it involves being wrist deep in chemicals come the weekend.

  7. #7
    Jersey Vic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Columbia County NY
    Shooter
    Holga
    Posts
    3,919
    Images
    187
    I think it depends on what you want-high contrast, grainy photo- journalistic looking images akin to 1960's rock concert stuff or a smoother total range with manageable grain and highlights. I like diafine very much for the later. You actually get a 1600 speed film while keeping your grain relatively unobtrusive and your highlights tame and printable.

    I've blew some of these up to 20x24 and they look fine In fact, the shadow detail is amazing:

    http://www.apug.org/gallery/showphot...25&ppuser=2517
    Holga: if it was any more analog, you'd need a chisel.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ontario
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    775
    Images
    28
    I've been using d-76 1:1 at 14min, agitate 30sec sit 45. I've been doing it for years and it works well for me. Mind you they're usually rock shows and to me, if tri-x was music it would probably be punk rock. It all depends one what you shoot and what the mood is. If I were shooting a jazz gig, I'd probably shoot with tmax 400 or something less grainy.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin