yeah. Been there. Done that. When the the working solution gets really dingy looking, it makes me...well...not feel too good about putting my film in it. I wish I had a set of deep tanks -- like in the darkrooms aboard Navy Aircraft Carriers.
Originally Posted by Anscojohn
But, I have to agree, it does work wonderfully.
Even un-replenished, D-23 gives beautiful results. I like it "seasoned" but not dingy. When metallic silver starts to fall out of solution, I do a few more sheets of film and then make fresh.
Brad, I've tweaked the Ansco 135 fomula to make a single 850ml batch that's already 2:1 dilution for one shot use. It uses 10G Sodium Sulfite and 10 G Sodium Carbonate. Very cheap. And if you're called away prematurely (as family men often are) it pours into an empty wine bottle and keeps for about 6 weeks with no air space. That's why I did it in the size I did. 135 is for slightly warm tones.
D-23 works fine at 1:3. IIRC there is a different developer that is almost the exact same formula as D-23 1:3 [Winchel?].
But at 1:3 it will be different then at stock. I'm all in favour of lower cost but considering the cost of film etc the first choice has to be the way things look. No?
A better way to lower cost IMHO instead of changing formulas is to buy your chemicals in larger bags. Price per kg goes down quite a bit the more you buy.
Just how much does a litre of developer cost you, and how much film will it process?
On a liter basis I use 1 and 10 grams metol and sulfite;
Originally Posted by BradS
half liter per 120 roll. My D-23 is an 8-80/liter on a full
strength basis. I've not tested below 10 grams/liter
working strength but think 5 or even less may do.
A half liter of .3, .9, .9 grams metol, sulfite, and
carbonate gave more than enough development.
Those are the ingredient ratios for Ansco 120.
If you're in a devil may care mood you might try
a liter at .5, 5, metol, sulfite. Slow film and 20
minutes. Doesn't take much. Don't need or
want the solvent effect? Carbonate. Dan
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)
It seems the high sulfite is needed to obtain the solvent action.G.W.Crawley, BJP Dec 16 1960,found the solvent action became detectable at about 45 g/L sulfite.
Originally Posted by BradS
In 1902 'The Metol Developer' had about 30 g/L sulfite in the working solution,see p0294 below, they do not seem to have recognised the solvent effect at that time. Perhaps Kodak discovered it.
Brad, check out cost of devs, a bit out date with prices, but perhaps it's all relative:http://unblinkingeye.com/Articles/De...Cost/cost.html
TryD-76H, or a variation. D-76 uses less metol than D-23, and when you cut out the H, it costs even less. You can cut the sulfite as low as you want.
There's also the Beutler Formula, FX-1 and Windisch D-23, 1+3.
Check out this link, for a very interesting article on D-76, and its many variations: http://silvergrain.org/wiki/D-76.
There is some good information about how developers like Ansco 17, particularly about the sulfite concentration.
That should have been, "...about how developers like Ansco 17 came to be developed..." Pun intended.
Sheesh! And I'm the person who deplores sloppy grammar!!
One way to reduce the cost of Sodium sulfite is to buy it bulk from a chemical supply house. I use a lot of it for paper developer and for hypo clear and buy it in 60 pound bags for about a dollar a pound. Less than a third what it costs in a photo store. You might be able to get sodium carbonate the same way.