Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,919   Posts: 1,556,430   Online: 1169
      
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684

    Print Today - Process Tomorrow

    I know, an easy test to make. What results though
    have others had. Are there some papers that won't
    hold their latent image?

    With what little time I've available for darkroom
    work I think I might be able to up my volume
    by splitting sessions. Dan

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eastern, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,020
    Images
    55
    g'day dan

    i don't think printing (exposing) now and processing later would be a good idea

    apart from any slight possibly of problems with latent image retention a printing session needs time for assessment and re-exposing if required

    why up your volume? quality is far more important than quantity

    Ray

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,344
    Images
    20
    The problem with that is that you don't get feedback on your print, and then you've got to wait to do the next attempt. If you've standardized your exposure pretty well, though, you could do proof sheets that way, as Garry Winogrand did. I suppose if you wanted to make many of the same print, you could do the first one, figure out the exposure, dodging and burning, and then expose the duplicates and process later.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #4
    Michel Hardy-Vallée's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Montréal (QC)
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,351
    Images
    132
    Batch processing a stack of print takes no time. If you have nailed properly all the exposure/dodge/burn/etc parameters, you could simply make the duplicates by exposing them all first, then developing by shuffling a stack of sheets at a time in trays. No need to wait later.

    Occasionally I do this for contacts when I have a large batch of the same film to proof. But it's tricky because shuffling prints in the developer is like constant agitation, thus augments the print contrast.

    What I prefer to do is to develop one print at a time, but stack them up in the stop bath (that's what it's for!). Once I have a dozen or so print, I shuffle them in the fixer. I don't know if it saves me processing time, but it cuts down on the number of manipulations and backaches.
    Using film since before it was hip.


    "One of the most singular characters of the hyposulphites, is the property their solutions possess of dissolving muriate of silver and retaining it in considerable quantity in permanent solution" — Sir John Frederick William Herschel, "On the Hyposulphurous Acid and its Compounds." The Edinburgh Philosophical Journal, Vol. 1 (8 Jan. 1819): 8-29. p. 11

    My APUG Portfolio

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray Heath View Post
    g'day dan. why up your volume? quality is far more important
    than quantity Ray
    Actually I've come to think it doesn't have anything to do with
    volume, great or small. More so it has to do with an efficient
    use of time and even space. Processing does follow printing
    but once under way is not complete until the print is out of
    the fix and holding.

    I'm something of a Time and Motion analyst. Some papers
    will be tested for image retention. That testing in itself will
    require later processing; an opportunity there for some
    workflow and space efficiencies observation. Likely
    printing today and processing tomorrow will work
    for some situations and not for others. Dan

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Eastern, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,020
    Images
    55
    sorry dan, i don't agree

    expose now, process later will not produce good work in any scenario

    traditional photography is not about "Time and Motion" or "workflow and space efficiencies"

    what about the other variables, solution temp and strength, state of mind, aesthetics, presentation, visual communication, ...

    Ray
    Last edited by Ray Heath; 04-30-2008 at 07:56 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: can't spell fffishencies

  7. #7
    Mick Fagan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Melbourne Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,844
    Images
    29
    Using Ilford multigrade RC papers I have done similar things, but usually with many, many prints, from the one negative.

    The biggest run I have had, was just over 2,000 5x8" prints from the one negative.

    I printed a handful at slightly different exposures and allowed two days to pass before I developed them. I then compared the results with prints developed straight after exposure, I couldn't see any difference.

    That said, there is a difference, especially with the variables Ray pointed out. I cannot explain them rationally, but they are there.

    Having done several large print runs from different negatives and papers, I can say it's possible, but I wouldn't do it for single print exposures.

    Mick.

  8. #8
    Matthew Gorringe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    461
    Images
    25
    Apart from the reservations already mentioned you should be fine to process a day or two later. I had cause to experiement with MGFB Warmtone a little while ago and found that waiting two weeks had not altered a midtone by any visible amount.
    Matt Gorringe

  9. #9
    jeroldharter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,958
    Images
    1
    I do this all the time with no problems or discernible difference between the quickly processed paper and the later processed paper.

    I typically have time to print 2-4 negatives in a session to the point of my best effort. If I have a negative worth printing/framing then I usually make 5-10 copies of the print. Once I have the printing sequence down, I expose the copies and put them in a paper safe. By then end of the session I have 10-20 sheets to process. Most of the time I process the same day, sometimes the next day. On some occasions up to 3 months later (Kentmere FinePrint VC FB). I never have any problems and the processing sequence and toning is much more time efficient when done in batches.

    I don't think the process degrades quality at all. For me, it improves quality because when my mind is in printing mode I am not distracted by the monotony of processing.
    Jerold Harter MD

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Willamette Valley, Oregon
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    3,684
    Quote Originally Posted by David A. Goldfarb View Post
    The problem with that is that you don't get feedback
    on your print, and then you've got to wait to do the
    next attempt.
    Perhaps my use of one-shot chemistry and single
    tray processing has me thinking of printing today and
    processing tomorrow.

    Duplicating my method, doing it conventionally, would use
    7 trays loaded with the usual working strength developer,
    stop, 1st fix, 2nd fix, rinse, hca, hold. Having that much
    to deal with before and after a session would justify
    only lengthy stays and greater volume. As well, 7
    trays in my compact lab?

    I use 2 trays, one for processing a second for hold. The
    2 together are used for alternate tray washes. Very
    dilute solutions make good use of the chemistry.
    Similar to one-shot rotary processing.

    Proofing is an exception to split processing. This evening
    I'll proof a negative full frame 2up on 5x7, two sheets, then
    print 1up 5x7, two sheets. Exposure will be determined using
    the four 2up test exposures.

    After that and an evaluation of the two 5x7s four more
    5x7s will be made for day after processing. If the negative
    is good to go larger that will follow. I use an EM-10 for
    same exposure with change in size. The EM-10 value
    is determined at the 5x7 size. Dan



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin