Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,901   Posts: 1,584,426   Online: 806
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33

    FP4+(@80) in T-max Dev

    Hey,

    Shot a roll of FP4+ and I have nothing else then T-Max Dev around. I Shot it at an EI of 80. Anyone got a suggestion about how to go about it to correctly develope it?

  2. #2

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,156
    I looked on the Massive Development Chart and it seems that the lowest speed given is 100 but there's not a lot between 80 and 100. If you go with the MDC time, note that the time given seems to be for rotary processing. You might want to look up the Kodak instructions for any increase in inversion development time assuming you don't have a rotary processor. The Kodak instructions might include a time for non Kodak films.

    The MDC is always worth a look if you haven't tried a particular combination. No doubt someone here has actually used FP4+ and T max dev so you'll get the benefit of actual experience.

    Best of luck

    pentaxuser

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33
    hey thanks pentaxuser. Yeah i figured that out that on the MDC is for rotary, so I went ahead and just guesstimate a time I thought would render good results. I developed for 6 1/2 min at a temp of 22°C. Dilution was 1+4 and agitation as stated on the box. They are washing now and although I certainly have an image, I'm afraid they are overdeveloped a little. I guess I'll go for 6mins...?
    Last edited by mohawk; 06-16-2008 at 08:26 PM. Click to view previous post history.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,156
    Ilford recommend a 15 to 20 % reduction for rotary processing. Assuming that you can apply the same 20 % addition for inversion from the MDC rotary time, this amounts to 4.5 mins(270 secs) plus 20% which is only 324 secs. Call it 5.5 mins and still at 20 degrees C. You have developed at 2 degrees more and that plus one minute more at 6.5mins is likely to give overdevelopment.

    I have never used this combo so this is all theory but based on your findings and using 20 degrees C, I'd go for 5.5. This is still at the top end of the 15-20% range. You might be fine at 6 mins but I suspect this may still be a little overdeveloped.

    The key is how well the 6.5 mins negs print. If the highlights are only a little overdeveloped and lack a little detail as oppsed to featureless white then 6 mins might be OK. Certainly the negs should print easier at 6mins than 6.5 especially if you reduce temp to 20 degrees C.

    Best of luck

    pentaxuser

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33
    Yes, they are dry now and I'll have to confirm they are overdeveloped, be it only slightly.
    I'll try shooting some more rolls and try both 6 and 5,5@20min. Thanks for the info pentaxuser, cheers!

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    433

    Try it at 1+6.5

    Hello
    I originally found TMax dev far too gutsy and contrasty until it was suggested by a photographer running a workshop many years ago that it's best dilution is actually 1+6.5. It certainly works for me and produces far smoother negs, especially when slightly overexposed. Best to test the dev time to suit, but won't be too far off the 1+4 times. I would reckon FP4 plus @ 80 would work out at about 6 mins-6 mins 30 at 1+6.5, 20?C. Please note, I'm not disputing, Kodak's published information, just stating my preference. Would still probably use it at 1+4 for pushing films or Neopan 1600 and TMax & Delta 3200.
    Cheers
    Mike
    PS. Where's the spill chuck gone?

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33
    I did another test today. Shot some portraits with soft summer evening light and 1 shot "contra-sunlight". The film was again rated 80 and developed accordingly. Only now I just developed for 5 1/2min and at a temp of 21°c. The portraits seem to be kind of flat and lacking contrast. Maybe a little underdeveloped. The "contra-sunlight" shot looks fine.

  8. #8

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    7,156
    Quote Originally Posted by mohawk View Post
    I did another test today. Shot some portraits with soft summer evening light and 1 shot "contra-sunlight". The film was again rated 80 and developed accordingly. Only now I just developed for 5 1/2min and at a temp of 21°c. The portraits seem to be kind of flat and lacking contrast. Maybe a little underdeveloped. The "contra-sunlight" shot looks fine.

    Sorry it has turned out this way. Does flat and lacking contrast apply to the appearance of the negs or are these the prints? The prints are the key, I feel.

    Sometimes negs might appear to lack "bite" but print very easily at grade 2-3. If they do and the prints have good contrast then I'd be unconcerned about the look of the negs.

    I think Roger Hicks used a good analogy about testing for development times when he talked of ranging as in artillery ranging. Firing too far and then too short helps determine the exact range quickly.

    Maybe you now know that the correct time is somewhere between 5.5 mins and 6.5 mins. Normally at development times of greater than 9-10 mins, 30 seconds is the smallest alteration to time that is likely to make a difference but at 5-6 mins maybe 15 secs difference would be noticeable.

    pentaxuser

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    33
    Hey pentaxuser,

    No need to feel sorry man, they are still printable so no worries

    I just inspected the negatives, didn't make any prints just yet. It will be for tomorrow or the day after.

    Yeah I now know more or less what I can expect from FP4+ rated 80, shot in certain conditions and developed in a certain way. I'm really kind of new to this and this is the first film I thoroughly test. It's not even my first choice of film, but it's a good learning school..
    I'll probably do some more testing and I'll report back. cheers

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,101
    Images
    9
    When you do your tests, try the procedure that Mike suggested. I think he gave you sage advice.

    Cheers.
    Last edited by Uhner; 06-17-2008 at 08:00 PM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: Nitpicking

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin