Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,696   Posts: 1,482,509   Online: 971
      
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    I have several rolls of Efke 100 & 50. I went looking for development times in D-76 1:1 at their rated ISOs. JandC lists a time of 12 minutes for 50 while Frugal Photographer and Digital Truth both list 8 minutes. For 100 JandC says 10, FP says 9 and DT says 9-12. Quite a spread. I'm just looking for a starting point here. Can somebody give me experience-based numbers for these films?

    -Neal
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    If it were me, I would plan on developing the film by inspection and begin inspecting the film at 85% of the lowest published time.
    Art is a step from what is obvious and well-known toward what is arcane and concealed.

    Visit my website at http://www.donaldmillerphotography.com

  3. #3
    James P. Smith's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    7
    I can't speak for Efke 50 which I have yet to try, but the times given for Efke 25 on Frugal's chart appear to be accurate from my experience, if that is any help. I am very impressed with this film, by the way.
    Analog forever from here in Austin, Tx!

  4. #4
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    James,
    That is very helpful. JandC's time looked kind of off the chart.

    Thanks
    -Neal
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    229
    While this doesn't directly answer Neal's question regarding Efke in D-76 I'll toss this into the pot...

    Efke R100 (the 120 version) at EI 100. Late afternoon/early evening, mostly moderate lighting under clear skies. Some photos under open shade; others under open sky after sunset.

    Neofin Blau, 30ml concentrate in 500ml distilled water (530ml total solution).

    11:30 (eleven minutes, thirty seconds) @ 75°F.

    Three inversions every minute in stainless reel/tank system.

    I was aiming for a higher contrast index to suit both the lighting and my dichro head.

    Lacking a densitometer I'll just say the results are very good. Excellent tonality with very satisfactory contrast for the lighting conditions (described above). Shadow detail was good but could be a bit better - this film in this developer might be better at EI 50-80.

    As expected from Neofin acutance was high with grain that was sharp and very tight. This developer might be best with TMX, Pan F+ and Efke 25.

    Efke R100 might be best with D-76/ID-11, Microdol-X, Perceptol, etc., if one wishes to minimize grain.

    BTW, my Efke R100 negs curled up tighter than an angry rattlesnake. Never saw such ferociously curled negatives. Fortunately I use a glass carrier in my Durst M605 so there's no problem. Tension from the curl actually helps with positioning the negs in this usually fussy carrier - if you've used this type of carrier you know what I mean.
    Three degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon.

  6. #6
    Flotsam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    S.E. New York State
    Posts
    3,221
    Images
    13
    Thanks Lex,

    To further complicate things, I have been trying to standardize all my processing in a Jobo.

    I shot a roll of R50 at 50 ISO, bracketed a stop each way and processed it at Frugal's suggested eight minutes, roughly compensating for the continuous agitation by cutting it to 6'30". The results weren't particularly conclusive by themselves but everything was nicely printable. This stuff lives up to it's reputation, it ain't no T-Max. More critical tests are required but I feel much more confident handling this film than when I made the original post in this thread.

    I don't test with a densitometer either, I just tweak exposure and dev times until my average negs consistantly print the way I like them on a #2 paper and then call that "N". That way, I figure, it takes all my personal equipment, materials and method variables into account. I enjoy the technical aspects of photography but what goes on the wall is going to have to stand entirely on it's aesthetic and visual merits no matter what the numbers say.

    If I manage to nail down some results that could possibly be useful to others, I'll be sure to post them.

    -Neal
    That is called grain. It is supposed to be there.
    =Neal W.=



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin