Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,684   Posts: 1,548,545   Online: 1085
      
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31

Thread: Gigabitfilm

  1. #11

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    747
    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Sukach

    Hmm... Wondering about this. Do you have any references re: f/stops and resolution?
    Diffraction limits?

    http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/diffraction.html

    also this from the Large format lens testing page.

    http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/results.html

    Scroll down to the discussion near the bottom.

  2. #12
    Ed Sukach's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,520
    Images
    26
    Quote Originally Posted by Robert
    Quote Originally Posted by Ed Sukach

    Hmm... Wondering about this. Do you have any references re: f/stops and resolution?
    Diffraction limits?
    http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/diffraction.html
    also this from the Large format lens testing page.
    http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/results.html
    Scroll down to the discussion near the bottom.
    Both web siites are excellent. Thanks for posting them.

    I think that it should be noted that, in theory, the *least* diffraction will occur at the largest possible aperture; but it should be noted that that is only one factor affecting the performance of an an optical system.

    Be *very* careful about defintitions here - do not confuse "diffraction limits" with something limiting the entire lens performance - "`Diffraction limited at...' indicates that aperture where lens performance will not *improve* by additional `stopping down'". The lens performance could be extremely high to start with ... so any "improvement" would be very difficult to achieve.

    The web sites are in FAQ format - and a diligent study of the questions and answers will provide a good education in just what happens when we talk about the phenomenon we call diffraction.

    Lens resolution is not *only* affected by diffraction - there are many, many other optical characteristics involved.
    Carpe erratum!!

    Ed Sukach, FFP.

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    747
    Yup that's why I mentioned a perfect lens. I was just trying to show how hard hitting those high numbers would be. One arguement for using the film might be it's better then your lens so you'll get what ever your lens can deliver. OTOH resolution isn't the only thing out there.

  4. #14

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    963
    I agree with Robert, "resolution isn't the only thing out there".

    In B&W, I've come to the conclusion that it's one of the least important factors. Tonal gradation is the most important factor. I recall from my fooling around H&W Control film (1971, I think) is that it produced an incredibly sharp, incredibly terrible print.

    I think you should pick your format based on required sharpness for a film giving you what you consider to be good tones. You won't lose much spontaneity using a medium format camera with fast film if, to get the same sharpness, you have to load EI 40 film into your 35mm camera.

  5. #15
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,319
    Images
    20
    Yeah, I also went through a TechPan phase and decided that it was easier and much better simply to use a bigger camera.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  6. #16

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Sunderland
    Posts
    10
    There is a review of this film in Black and White Photography, Feb 2004. Julian Busselle reckons enlargements to 20x30 off 35mm film were "still exceedingly sharp"!

  7. #17

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Jacksonville, FL
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,646
    Just ordered Gigabit 4X5 sheet film from J&C. At ISO 25, probably not suitable for landscape scenes that may have any motion (wind, water) unless you want to show the motion. I'll probably try it with Brett & Ed Weston type of subject matter. I'll be trying enlargements but wonder if drum scans would even capture its resoving power?
    van Huyck Photo
    "Progress is only a direction, and it's often the wrong direction"

  8. #18

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    15
    I think last month's Black and White Photography Magazine did a review of it. There was much discussion about the film and its developer. The author had to try a couple times to get the processing down but said it was a tack sharp splendid film.
    Visit my online gallery at www.cannonphotography.fotopic.net

  9. #19
    JohnArs's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Switzerland
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,068
    Images
    40
    Hi

    I use Gigabitfilm from time to time but not anymore in 4x5 only in 35 mm and fast and sharp lenses.
    It is actually a very good film for high contrast scenes if I remember correctly it can cover a contrast of 11f stops.
    But in the beginning days there has been some troubles with the developer and so I use it only in Xtol now.
    There is no grain for focusing by the enlarger part, but I have to do further testing in XTol.
    Good light and nice shadows!

    www.artfoto.ch

  10. #20
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,259
    Images
    73
    Isn't this gigabit film just a repackaged AGFA copy film? I think I remember seeing that somewhere.

    Maybe you could buy it from AGFA cheaper?
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin