Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,536   Posts: 1,544,096   Online: 1008
      
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Calgary AB Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    233
    Images
    8

    Kentmere RC Boxes split apart

    Now that Ilford owns Kentmere, will we see them replace the awful boxes used for the 100 sheet 8x10 papers. They always split apart in the corners. I usually transfer the whole box to an empty Ilford box.

    Don't get me wrong, I love the papers.

  2. #2
    PhotoJim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Regina, SK, CA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,221
    At least you're getting boxes. My local dealer stocks the Ilford eco-packs which are essentially the papers, double-bagged without a box. Does the job but a box is handy for storing proof prints later. I've kept some old boxes for this very purpose.
    Jim MacKenzie - Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada

    A bunch of Nikons; Feds, Zorkis and a Kiev; Pentax 67-II (inherited from my deceased father-in-law); Bronica SQ-A; and a nice Shen Hao 4x5 field camera with 3 decent lenses that needs to be taken outside more. Oh, and as of mid-2012, one of those bodies we don't talk about here.

    Favourite film: do I need to pick only one?

  3. #3
    Bob F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    London
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,984
    Images
    19
    Good idea. Any chance Simon?

    Even 10-year old Ilford boxes are way stronger than spanking new Kentmere ones (though taping up the Kentmere boxes' corners with gaffer tape helps a lot)... Also useful for transferring paper from 10 or 25-sheet envelopes.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,964
    This puts me off Kentmere a bit. Even Jessops boxes are fairly robust. If that comparison isn't enough of an incentive for Harman Ilford then I don't know what is

    Seriously for those who don't automatically decant the whole box into a paper safe and throw the box, good boxes are invaluable in the darkroom. There are the last line of defence against any possibility of light fogging. Lee Frost even uses his boxes( Ilford) to store his liquid emulsioned papers until they dry.

    If Kentmere previously "cut corners" on box construction then I would have thought it would pay Ilford to rectify matters.

    Here's hoping

    pentaxuser

  5. #5
    Monophoto's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Saratoga Springs, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,691
    Images
    44
    This problem isn't unique to Kentmere. I used a lot of Freestyle's Arista paper over the years, and their boxes were also a bit flimsy.

    The problem isn't with the gauge of the cardboard. Boxes are formed by bending the cardboard, and then glueing a layer of paper over everything to both seal the corners and provide a base for the printed advertising. The problem is that the paper layer doesn't provide a lot of strength.

    The solution: reinforce the corners with 'packing tape' - that semi-transparent tape that has nylon fibers embedded in it. I've been using the same two 8x10 boxes for at least 15 years - one for FB paper and one for RC.
    Louie

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,838
    Dear All,

    I will have a look at it, I am aware that the boxes are not like ILFORD Photo boxes, although they must be
    ( and are, we checked, fit for purpose ) the reason is pretty obvious our boxes are more robust and more expensive to make, I know as we have had the same box maker since 1946.....so they are very, very good.
    Its just one of the reasons ILFORD Paper is more expensive then KENTMERE paper.

    I will promise to look at it in detail and come back to you

    Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :

  7. #7

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,964
    Quote Originally Posted by Simon R Galley View Post
    Dear All,


    Its just one of the reasons ILFORD Paper is more expensive then KENTMERE paper.

    I will promise to look at it in detail and come back to you

    Simon ILFORD Photo / HARMAN technology Limited :
    Simon. It all depends on where you go. A quick internet search revealed that in 4 cases Kentmere was more expensive and in one case much more. While in two cases Ilford was the more expensive and in one case considerably more.

    In a couple of cases as quoted above the difference was very small either way. I appreciate that you have no control over retail prices from stockist to customer but in four cases the customer is getting the poorer box and the more expensive paper.

    Maybe, just maybe, if you produced the more expensive box and passed on the extra cost to the retailer, they would absorb it in their current price. In three out of the 4 cases where the customer is paying extra for being a Kentmere enthusiast I suspect the price premium paid for being that enthusiast is about at its limit.

    I am going to give Kentmere a go one day but I'll certainly avoid those
    retailers who appear to be charging a large premium for Kentmere with its poorer box.


    pentaxuser

  8. #8
    Adrian Twiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Wigan (oop North) United Kingdom
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    612
    Images
    10
    Kentmere are certainly not alone in this. I bought 2 boxes of Foma paper and they were both split.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin