Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 71,476   Posts: 1,570,998   Online: 902
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Andrew Moxom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Keeping the British end up in Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,871
    Images
    333

    Agfa Record Rapid and lith

    Does anyone know if Agfa Record Rapid paper lith's? I have a small stash of G2 and G3 paper that I acquired on feebay some time back that is fogged in regular developer, but might work with lith. Anyone know for sure how this paper behaves?

    Thanks

    Andy
    Please check out my website www.amoxomphotography.com and APUG Portfolio .....

  2. #2
    nze
    nze is offline
    nze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    France
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    705
    Blog Entries
    3
    Images
    49
    I have grany result with my stock. nothing similar to the great portriga . I will take care of the problem when I ended my portriga stock.
    Chris Nze
    me Apug Portfolio
    Me web page

  3. #3
    Bob Carnie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Toronto-Ontario
    Shooter
    Med. Format RF
    Posts
    4,682
    Images
    14
    Hi Andrew

    I have only had sketchy results with Agfa products with lith, not sure why , but love the products for traditional printing.

  4. #4
    Martin Reed's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    North London
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    325
    It depends on the age; there were three known 'strains' of Record Rapid; the original truly classic one contained cadmium and lithed well. When Agfa had to clean the act up it was replaced by another formulation, without cadmium, but still ok for lith. This was changed again and the last one was the 'greenest', but had so little going for it in terms of image potential that most users lost interest and moved onto Agfa Classic, or other papers, and RR lost ground to the point it was discontinued.

    However Mk's 1 & 2 (lithable) were not distributed in North America - the Mark 3 was sold in the US, but didn't lith at all.

    I think that's correct, but Tim Rudman would be the one to verify it.

  5. #5
    Andrew Moxom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Keeping the British end up in Minnesota
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,871
    Images
    333
    Thanks everyone. I guess I will have to try it out and see. Martin, great information! this maybe MkII, but thought RR was marketed into the US as the Agfa Insignia brand. Not sure on the time frames of that though. What I have is Insignia G2 and G3 in what looks to be early to mid 90's packaging.
    Please check out my website www.amoxomphotography.com and APUG Portfolio .....

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    848
    Images
    131
    Andrew, the definitive test of "will it or won't it" is to put a drop of Sol B on the paper, with lights on, and look for a reaction. A rapid purple/brown/black reaction is indicative of developer incorporated in the emulsion, and the paper is not suitable for lith. (The question I cannot get answered is, if you process a developer-incorporated paper in lith, will it ruin the soup?)

    That grainy, flat monochrome look that Chris describes is typical for a non-lithable paper. Put a drop of B on it, see what happens.

  7. #7
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,392
    Images
    148
    Back in the UK I still have some Mk 1 Record Rapid, I'll have to try it next time I return

    Ian



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin