Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,940   Posts: 1,557,446   Online: 829
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: FX-55 tonality

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,158

    FX-55 tonality

    FX-55 is Geoffrey Crawley's new ascorbate developer.
    I mention it because it appears to give a rather special tonality.
    Mine was made up in propylene glycol using excess potassium carbonate,as suggested by Patrick Gainer:
    http://www.apug.org/forums/forum37/5...developer.html
    If preferred the part B can be made up just before use as Crawley suggested.
    I develop for double (2x) the Xtol 1+1 times at www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html
    My agitation is 30s start then 2 inversions on each minute.This is about 50% longer than Crawley's times,he agitates every 15 sec.
    On the attachment I have plotted the curves for Delta 100 in FX-55 (from Crawley's AP article) and in ID-11 (similar to D-76, from Ilford's data).
    The curves suggest a higher contrast for FX-55 in the lower mid tones.
    I made prints from negatives of the same scene in different developers.FX-55 gave somewhat higher mid-tone contrast than Xtol 1+3, more than PC-TEA and a lot more than D-76 1+1.As its pH is only about 8 FX-55 gives fine grain although with low sulfite it is an acutance developer not a solvent developer.
    Anyhow this first rather unscientific tests suggests FX-55 has potential for interesting tonality.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails FX-55 curve.jpg  

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Belarus
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    36
    Alan,
    how did you make the working solution:
    1) adding 10 ml of B glycol solution to 1 liter made of 100 ml A solution and 900 ml water
    or
    2) adding 10 ml of B glycol solution to 300 ml made of 30 ml A solution and 270 ml water ?

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Alamos, NM
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,062
    From your curves, the contrast looks about the same. But there are some other things that bother me. Your curves show a extraordinary speed increase. Has the FX-55 curve been shifted to the left? I also notice the pronounced shoulder in the FX-55 curve, contrasted to the "straight line to infinity" for the ID-11 curve. That would suggest that films developed in FX-55 suffer severe highlight compression and are intolerant of overexposure. Could you expand on your experiences?

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,158
    Hi Igor,
    Here is the formula I calculated and used,it is essentially the same as that given by Pat Gainer except I believe he rounded it off.
    FX-55 in Propylene Glycol (adapted from Amateur Photographer 13 Sept 2008)
    Part A
    Potassium Carbonate anh 24.53g
    Sodium Bicarbonate..........1.5g
    Sodium Sulfite.................25g
    Sodium Metabisulfite.........12g
    Distilled water to.............1000ml
    Part B
    Ascorbic acid (vitamin C)...11.56g
    Phenidone.........................1g
    Propylene glycol.................80ml
    Dissolves on heating to 160F and stirring,unavoidable hazard:flammable and can cause burns,wear protective gear, see threads on safety making PC-TEA.
    Finally make up to 100ml with propylene glycol.
    For use take 100ml Part A + 10ml Part B to make 1000ml working solution,pH~8
    Develop for double(2x) the Xtol 1+1 times at www.digitaltruth.com/devchart.html
    Agitate 30s then 2 inversions on each minute.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,158
    Norman,
    I think you are probably right about one of the curves being shifted,I just took them off the data mentioned to show the difference in tonality which I confirmed with a few prints in different developers.
    IIRC, Crawley has written that he believes sodium is more active than potassium in a developer.If the less active Potassium is used there is an increase in shadow detail and speed as the film gets longer in the developer before the mid-tones are correctly developed.
    I have not yet done proper testing of film speed or photography of white clouds in blue sky so cannot answer the highlight question.Might be lucky,maybe it will make usually straight line tabular grain film like S-shape traditional film,not tested yet.

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Belarus
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    36
    Many thanks, Alan.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,158
    More tests.
    I did not find much difference between FX-55 in Glycol and PC-TEA 1:50 using T-max 100 film and 8x enlargements.
    The FX-55 takes 50% longer to develop.
    There is no difference in average metering EI, both had EI=80 sun/shade.
    No perceptible difference in grain or acutance on 8x enlargement.
    Tonality can be equalized by using higher contrast with PC-TEA.
    Perhaps there are subtle differences only apparent on larger prints.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin