Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,712   Posts: 1,482,998   Online: 803
      
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Tri-X confusion

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    246
    Hoping the someone can set me straight on the various new/old Tri-X's out there.

    What, in a nutshell is the difference between TX and TXP?

    What sizes are they available in?

    Have they both been updated/changed "improved"?

    Confused in Winter-peg.

  2. #2
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,080
    Images
    20
    Old versions were TX, TXP, and TXT. TX was a nominally 400 speed film that came in 35mm and 120 (and other rollfilm sizes in the course of its history). TXP and TXT were nominally rated at 320 and had a longer toe, meaning they were less forgiving in terms of exposure at the shadow end, and were designated "professional" or "studio" films, though anyone with good exposure technique could certainly get good pictures with them under a variety of circumstances. TXP came in 120 and TXT came in sheet sizes.

    Now there is TX 400 (in 35mm and 120) and TXP 320 (in 120 and sheet sizes), and they are supposed to have the same tonal qualities as the old versions, with greater resistance to dust, finer grain, and slightly different development times. As these new versions come out, people are testing to see whether the claims are true. I haven't tried them yet (still have about 50 rolls of TX 120, and 100 sheets of TXT 4x5, and about 40 sheets of 8x10", and 6 of 11x14" before I have to try the new stuff--I'll let everyone else work out the kinks first).

  3. #3
    Jorge Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Brazil
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    614
    At least the 400Tx (new emulsion) has been tested a lot.

    Slightly finer grain, slightly less dev times, but otherwise very much like the older one.

    The only time that nobody can explain is 400TX in HC-110 B. It seems Kodak made an error in it (too short a time).

    Jorge O

  4. #4
    ann
    ann is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,856
    Images
    26
    we have been using the "new" version with HC 110 "B' at the same time as the old (for our lab). 6 minutes at 68 and it is fine.,



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin