Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,105   Posts: 1,636,551   Online: 992
      
Results 1 to 9 of 9
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81

    Whoops Developing times...

    Ok guys what are your thoughts on this.

    I have a bulk roll of what I thought was Tri-X400. I picked up some Rodinal and decided to give it a whirl. Well seeing as how I am on the road 4 days a week I just decided to bring it with me and scan the negs when I get back home but I realized I made a mistake. The film was really Agfa APC 400!!!


    I use Digital truth for my times and mixed up my developer at 1 + 60 and for Tri-x it was 15 mins

    So after I found out what the film really was I checked out the times for Agfa APX 400 and they listed 1 + 50 320-500 11 mins.

    So since my mix was a bit more diluted you think the time was close? The photos are of nothing really in particular I just wanted to see what the results of Rodinal were really like. Just eye-balling the negatives they look a "little" dense but until I shoot another roll and develop it at the right times I wont know.


    Thanks in advance!
    ~m

  2. #2
    Christopher Walrath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a darkroom far, far away...
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    7,115
    Blog Entries
    30
    Images
    19
    Well, let's see. 15 minutes is about a 40% increase in developing time. Your dilution was 1.7% as opposed to 2%. I think you're gonna have a little more contrast and density than you intended but at that dilution it shouldn't be TOO far off.
    Thank you.
    -CW

    "Wubba, wubba, wubba. Bing, bang, bong. Yuck, yuck, yuck and a fiddle-dee-dee." - The Yeti

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81
    Digital Truth doesn't give times for 1 + 60 or 1 + 70, how could I determine the developing times for those dilutions?

    Thanks!
    ~m

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Washington DC area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    596
    not as bad as my first use of HC110:

    I made the classic dilution error and used it at 1:7 instead of 1:31

    ouch...horrible

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81
    Does anyone have an equation or a table to determine developing times for dilutions smaller then 1+25 or 1+50? I want to get *finer* grain results then 1+25
    I am guessing there has got to be some constant where (x) time = (y) dilution?

    Thanks!
    ~m

  6. #6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    If you're after finer grain you should switch away from Rodinal. If you need a liquid concentrate, then perhaps HC-110 would be a better choice. (I've never used HC-110 myself, though.) If a powdered developer is OK, then D-76 or XTOL are good general-purpose developers. There are others that produce still finer grain, but usually at the cost of film speed and/or acutance.

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Washington DC area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    596
    Quote Originally Posted by mr. mohaupt View Post
    Does anyone have an equation or a table to determine developing times for dilutions smaller then 1+25 or 1+50? I want to get *finer* grain results then 1+25
    I am guessing there has got to be some constant where (x) time = (y) dilution?

    Thanks!
    ~m

    can you plot the data you have on graph paper or something and see if it's a straight line & then extrapolate?

    I'm sure there's a "reciprocity failure" for extreme dilutions

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81
    You know I will try that right now, see what I can get....


    As for Rodinal I guess I am not looking for FINER grain per say but finer then what 1+25 gives you. I like the liquid concentrate because it is easier to mix up on the road for me.

    ~m

  9. #9

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    NC
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    81
    I am not sure how accurate this is. I just plotted a line graph on my computer.

    I got y=a*x+b, a=-.6667, b=8.6667

    Where y is the % of the mixture and x is the time. The points I used as my known points were (1+50)@500ml= 2% @10 mins and (1+25)=4% @11 mins

    For (1+60) 1.7% the graph is telling me ~10.46 mins which is telling me my negatives should have came back black??


    Thoughts?
    ~m
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Rodinal_Agfa APX.jpg  



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin