Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,687   Posts: 1,548,635   Online: 1197
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Tom Nutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Eastern USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    218
    Blog Entries
    2

    photo-flo for reticulation

    A photo friend told me today that if you add photo flo to your developer, for BW rollfilm, you will get some crazy reticulation effects. Has anybody tried this?:rolleyes:

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    905
    one can force reticulation by using a higher temp for your developer, around 110 degrees or so, followed by an immersion in cold water (as in ice cube cold), guarnateed reticulation every time. At least thats what I used to do in high school when I wanted that effect.

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Washington DC area
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    596
    I just boil the negatives....

    emulsion eventually starts to come off...you can warp the negative too

    ...but it looks great

  4. #4
    Tom Nutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Eastern USA
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    218
    Blog Entries
    2
    Well, what I'm getting at here is that I have some Ilford 3200 in 120 and I'd like to develop it in a way that gives it as much grain and distress as possible... I guess I could underexpose then overdevelop then go back to high school, and pour boiling water on the film then go back to college and walk on the wet negs to create a little distress.

    ...is there a technique with this film that might be a little more controllable?
    ...andthe photoflo, just an urban myth?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,341
    I've accidentally reticulated Tri-X twice now by developing it in PMK and somehow putting it into too cold a fix or wash or photoflo. I think the hardening/tanning effect of the pyro or the emulsion-swelling effect of the alkali makes the emulsion more sensitive to temperature variations. I'd try as the folks above advised: develop it, heat it up, plunge it into icewater, fix it. See what happens.

    Peter Gomena

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Long Island, New York
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,067
    I don't think Photo Flo in the developer will reticulate - a lot of people routinely use wetting agent in the developer to attain more even development. However, if you soak a fully processed and dried neg in developer for 30 seconds, then dry the neg - without rinsing or wiping - you'll get some really crazy, random crystalline textures on the neg.

    Bob H

    PS I accidentally discovered this as a result of my exceptionally careful processing regimen.
    "Why is there always a better way?"

  7. #7
    Akki14's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    London, UK
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    1,873
    Images
    210
    Photoflo in developer can cause interesting bubbles...
    ~Heather
    oooh shiny!
    http://www.stargazy.org/

  8. #8
    ann
    ann is offline

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,879
    Images
    26
    i had some students get some very strange "markings" on the film. more like snake skin. After a lot of research and questioning the prevailing theory was some "left over" photoflo that had adhered itself to the tank.

    Don't know if that was really the reason, but it did happen at least twice, and we have a temperature controled water system so there was no way it was a heat issue.
    http://www.aclancyphotography.com

  9. #9

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Daventry, Northamptonshire, England
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    6,997
    Never noticed this with Ilford wetting agent certainly. If the photo-flo was at a vastly different temp then maybe but it would be the temp difference not the photoflo per se.

    I had the experience of mistakenly turning on the hot tap to rinse a HP5+ film in a very dimly lit darkroom and not noticing for quite a few mins. Result was no damage whatsoever to the film. HP5+ must be a very tough film which is normally a good thing but if you were to experiment with hot water and if it was HP5+ it would have to be very hot water, based on my experience. Then there might just be a danger that it is an all or nothing at all experiment i.e nothing happens until suddenly the emulsion gives way suddenly and completely.

    If it were me I'd try with negs I could go out and shoot again - certainly not ones I could not replicate easily.

    pentaxuser

  10. #10

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    Myth. Photoflo cannot cause reticulation. Extreme temperature swings can. The effects are not controllable to any great extent.
    Frank Schifano

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin