Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,228   Posts: 1,532,712   Online: 772
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: beaker design

  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    653
    A few months ago I bought some Bomax beakers from Photographer's Formulary and, believe it or not, I'm not sure I'm using them right (!). The problem is that the last measuring mark on each beaker is one level shy of its rated capacity: the 1000 ml is only marked to 900ml, the 50ml is only marked to 40ml, etc... There's plenty of extra glass (capacity) available for that last critical mark, but the damned things just aren't there. Obviously, it's not difficult to guess where they would be, but I'm wondering whether the design assumes some procedure used by chemistry-literate people that automatically results in the proper measurement. Stupid as I am, I just can't figure out what that would be.

  2. #2
    Silverpixels5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    594
    Images
    15
    The 1000mL of the beaker is just the maximum capacity, and so they never show the graduated marks up to that amount. Even the marks on there are only nominal and not precise. If you want accurate amounts then I reccomend a graduated cylinder. If a close ballpark is what you are after then just get a beaker or flask that is larger than you need so that it will have the marks up to where you will be using it.
    RL Foley

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    653
    Thanks, Silver. I still find it strange that a beaker, advertised as 1000 ml and having more than enough capacity for that amount, doesn't bother showing you where the critical level actually is. I've got a scale rated for 1000 grams that doesn't peter out at 900.

    Okay, rant mode off. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't overlooking anything obvious.

    Thanks.

  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,281
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Poco, it's just the same with all beakers. They're not intended for measuring, just mixing and heating. The markings could easily be made more precise, but then I guess somebody would complain that they're not precise...
    A graduated cylinder is generally used for measuring - you can easily calibrate (put a line at the approximately right place) your beakers to use them for mixing photo chemistry. We don't need 3 decimals precision, after all.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    653
    Ole,

    Yeah, I've come to the conclusion they do it to discourage people from using them to mix chemicals -- measurements are imprecise and we'll make damned sure you know it!

    Doesn't stop me, though :-)



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin