Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,908   Posts: 1,521,515   Online: 898
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6
    Hi, I've just started using efke 100 in 5x7 sheet size and am developing it in D-76 1:1 at the recomended time of 8 mins at 68degrees. While I am happy with the results I am wondering what some of you are doing with your efke and what would you recomend for developer and times. I rate the film at 50 asa. Thanks.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    6
    oooops, instead of 8 mins I should have put 10 mins. Thanks again.

  3. #3
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,158
    Images
    20
    I posted a couple of my first test shots a while back:

    http://www.apug.org/site/main/album_...hp?pic_id=1007

    http://www.apug.org/site/main/album_...hp?pic_id=1006

    These were at EI 100, but now I'm rating it at EI 80 for 10 min. in PMK 1+2+100, 68deg. F, agitating every 15 sec. in a Nikor 4x5" stainless steel tank.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  4. #4
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    I use FX-2 and develop by inspection - no idea of the time. Alternatively I use stand development for 90 minutes. I rate it at 100, but shadow density is good enough that I could probably get away with 200.
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  5. #5
    roy
    roy is offline
    roy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    West Sussex
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,302
    [quote="Ole"]Alternatively I use stand development for 90 minutes

    Still the same developer I presume Ole, any agitation at all ?
    Roy Groombridge.

    Cogito, ergo sum.
    (Descartes)

  6. #6
    Ole
    Ole is offline
    Ole's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    9,280
    Blog Entries
    1
    Images
    31
    Same developer, FX-2, but at half strength. I generally agitate for the first minute, then leave it alone.

    The first time I tried this I had just two 9x12cm sheets to develop, so I decided to put them in an old "Johnson Cutplate Developing Tank". Inversion is impossible, indeed agitation of any kind is as good as impossible. So I gave a five-minute presoak, poured out the water, poured in developer, then went off to watch TV for a while. Poured out developer after about 90 minutes, then quick water wask and fix. Negatives were exellent!
    -- Ole Tjugen, Luddite Elitist
    Norway

  7. #7
    juan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    St. Simons Island, Georgia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,637
    Images
    4
    I've been using Pyrocat HD, 2:2:100 for Azo, brush development. I develop by inspection and begin looking at 8-minutes.
    juan

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    I developed the first Efke PL100 that I have shot today in BTZS type tubes. Using gentle agitation I developed a SBR 5 negative (N+2 or thereabouts) for 25 minutes in Pyrocat HD 1-1-100. When I read the net density through the blue channel of my densitometer I found that the density range was 1.35. This would probably print on a diffusion light source enlarger (grade 1 1/2 to 2) but would possess to much contrast for my condensor enlarger without resorting to split development.

    I next processed a SBR 6 negative (N+1 or thereabouts). Using the same method as previous I developed for 17 minutes and the density range was 1.40. Again would print on Grade 1-1/2 on diffusion but would be to contrasty for condensor without split development.

    I next developed a SBR 5 negative for 20 minutes in the same manner as above. The net density of this negative was 1.20. This would print on both enlargers...although condensor would require minimal split development.

    My last negative (SBR5) was developed in a minimal agitation using Pyrocat HD 1-1-200 (twice normal dilution for enlarging) for 40 minutes. Agitation of one minute at outset and 15 seconds at 1/4, 1/2, and 3/4 of total development time. The net density of this negative was 1.09. This method of development has provided the sharpest negative that I have probably ever encountered. This negative density is tailor made for a condensor head.

    This is probably going to be my film/developer of choice from now on based upon the four negatives that I have processed. This film builds almost as much density with Pyrocat at 1-1-100 dilution as Classic 200 does with 2-2-100 dilution.

    I look forward to further trials of more normal contrast scenes. This film certainly has loads of potential insofar as expansion of contrast and the development in BTZS type tubes eliminates the damage potential that some have encountered in tray development.

  9. #9
    roy
    roy is offline
    roy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    West Sussex
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1,302
    Quote Originally Posted by dnmilikan
    I developed the first Efke PL100 that I have shot today in BTZS type tubes. .
    This is interesting as I have started to use this film (albeit in 120 size) and have been talking to Francesco about his experiences with gentle agitation, like you, also in large format. I shall be using small tank and am trying to assess what sort of development times I need to give to achieve 'gentle agitation'. I think I must expose a film that I am prepared to sacrifice to find out what is happening, never having used pyrocat before.
    Roy Groombridge.

    Cogito, ergo sum.
    (Descartes)

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    These are the development times that I have determined for Efke PL100 sheet film using BTZS type tubes. These were developed using Pyrocat HD at a dilution of 1-1-100.

    SBR 7 (n development)--11 minutes at 70 degrees

    SBR 6 (N plus one development or thereabouts)--14 1/2 minutes

    SBR 5 (N plus two development or thereabouts)--18 1/2 minutes

    These times will give a density range of appr. 1.20. This is net density (high density minus low density...not minus FB+fog). These should work with a diffusion light source enlarger.

    This film appears to have great potential as an Azo or alternative film since it builds density much faster and to a greater extent then Classic 200.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin