Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 76,304   Posts: 1,681,578   Online: 913
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Abu Dhabi UAE
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    30

    Best developer for Ilford 100 or Tri X?

    Hi,

    I've just started to take portraits (mainly daylight with a Nikon F100 & 85mm lens) & locally (UAE) can source both Delta 100 & Tri X film.

    Any thoughts on what developer with give me the sharpest negs - by that I mean smallest grain.

    Thanks & hi from the desert :-)

    Andy

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Newtown, PA USA
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    409
    That's kind of a misnomer. Developers that give "sharper" looking negs generally achieve that by having more dominant grain.

  3. #3
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    17,013
    Images
    148
    Sharper negs doesn't mean more dominant grain at all. Try Perceptol diluted 1+3 very sharp with reduced grain.

    Ian

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    692
    Delta 100 is to fine grain as Tri-X is to lovely visible grain.

    I think it would be wrong to force Tri-X to be something it's not. That said, Xtol 1:3 will minimize the grain of Tri-X and virtually eliminate any grain in Delta 100.

    Different films for different things. It's all good.

  5. #5
    darkosaric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Hamburg, Germany
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,544
    Images
    4
    Hi,

    I have tried ilford delta 100 in perceptol and grain is almost invisible. But still I like it more in rodinal, grain is little bigger (I see this when using grain focuser while developing prints), but it looks sharper.

    Here are examples in perceptol and rodinal (cheap canonscan scanner, paper scan):

    http://darkosaric.deviantart.com/art/zg-19-59185256

    http://darkosaric.deviantart.com/art/Cracow-3-125364290

    Also you will find examples of trix in rodinal (no need to say which is my favorite developer ), and some other combination. I usually put film/developer info below picture.

    Regards,

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Westport, MA.
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    1,063
    For 35mm portraits i've been a fan of Kodak Microdol-X at 1:1. It's been a looong time since i've used it but when I did, it was during my portrait phase.

    My philosophy now is basically use whatever you have, know, or can find..
    Look for good light!

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Omaha, Nebraska
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,512
    Images
    4
    A dozen folks will provide a dozen different answers. For Delta 100 I like XTOL 1-3. Very fine grain and great sharpness up to 11x14 enlargements. When I shot Tri X I used D-76 1-1. I recently bought a bunch of the Arista Premium 400 (re-packaged Tri X) and will develop that in Xtol and compare it to older Kodak negs done in D-76.
    "Fundamentally I think we need to rediscover a non-ironic world"
    Robert Adams



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin