Discussions: 61,006 | Messages: 835,436 | Members: 39,742 | Online: 314 | Chatroom: 3
User Name:  Password:
Support Doctors Without Borders in Haiti

 
APUG search    RSS MOBILE  FORUMS   SELECT LANGUAGE  
Customize Sidebar
Recent Classifieds
Go Back   APUG > APUG English Forums > Darkroom > B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry > Why the time differences between Ilford and Kodak rapid fixers?


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-02-2009, 01:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oregon and Austria
Posts: 182
Why the time differences between Ilford and Kodak rapid fixers?

I always assumed that the Ilford and Kodak rapid fixers were similar products. I've noticed recently, however, that there is a rather significant discrepancy in the recommended fixing times for fiber-base papers.

Ilford's recommendation (from the pdf document from the Ilford web site) for "film-strength" rapid fix (1+4) is 1 minute; for "paper strength" (1+9) is 2 minutes. For two-bath fixing they recommend half the respective fixing time in each bath.

Kodak's recommendation for fiber-base papers (from the instruction sheet packed with the product) are longer: 6-10 minutes for single bath at "paper strength" (1+7) and no recommendation for "film strength."

Given that the recommended times for "general purpose films" are almost exactly the same (2-5 minutes for Ilford, 2-4 minutes for Kodak), I would assume that the respective dilutions of the products were similar.

Why, then, does Kodak indicate triple the Ilford recommended time as a minimum for fiber-base paper? Are Ilford times too short? Is Kodak being over-cautious? Are the fixers really different? What gives?

TIA

Doremus Scudder
www.DoremusScudder
Doremus Scudder is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 01:43 PM   #2 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,380
Images: 32
They are quite different formulae, the Kodak product contains a hardener, and works at pH 4.4 while Hypam/Ilford Rapid Fixer has a pH of 5.4 (working solution).

The hardener & more acidic pH will slow fixation, and also mean longer wash times are needed. Hypam differs very slightly from Ilford Rapid Fixer in it's buffering which allows a hardener to be used if needed, but otherwise they are interchangeable.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 01:46 PM   #3 (permalink)
 
clayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
Posts: 905
Pretty sure the Kodak RF does not include a hardener. Their normal fixer does include a hardener, however.
__________________
The negative is the recording, the print is the master.

http://www.flickr.com/kediwah
clayne is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 01:50 PM   #4 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,380
Images: 32
Kodak's MSDS indicates Aluminium Sulphate and Sulphuric acid in Kodak Rapid fixer, they are only used for hardening, and to acidify the Fixer to pH 4.4 which is necessary to keep the Aluminium Sulphate in solution.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 01:55 PM   #5 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 14,190
I have tested both Kodak and Ilford papers in Kodak fixers and some of my own formulation. I find that the Kodak papers (now defunct) fix more slowly than the comparable Ilford papers. So, the difference in instructions may also reflect a carryover from this observation. Kodak probably established that data using their own Polycontrast Rapid IV years ago.

However, presence of a hardener will slow fixing and washing. Also, pH would affect fixing slowing it as pH goes down, so this may also be a factor even if hardener is lacking.

PE
Photo Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Sponsored Ad. (Subscribers to APUG have the option to remove this ad.)

Old 07-02-2009, 01:57 PM   #6 (permalink)
 
Paul Sorensen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Saint Paul, MN
Posts: 1,582
Kodak rapid fixer comes in two parts, one is a hardener. I have always used it without, but it is there for those who want to use it. I am guessing that the MSDS is for the solution as used, so it would include the hardener. You can see this on this page at Freestyle.
__________________
Paul Sorensen
http://paulsorensenphoto.com
Paul Sorensen is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 02:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
 
clayne's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA | Kuching, MY | Jakarta, ID
Posts: 905
I stand corrected, then. :-)
__________________
The negative is the recording, the print is the master.

http://www.flickr.com/kediwah
clayne is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 02:07 PM   #8 (permalink)
 
Ian Grant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Turkey (West Midlands, UK)
Posts: 9,380
Images: 32
It's worth noting that in some thread hear on APUG people mention leaving out Part B of Kodak Rapid fixer, this is the Hardener, as it only contains the Sulphuric Acid and Aluminium Sulphate you effectively have a Fixer very similar to Hypam.

One reason many Pyro users want Alkaline fixers may well have do with the Sulphuric acid in Koadak Rapid Fixer.

Paul the MSDS is for Part A, Part B and also the working solution.

Ian
__________________
My APUG portfolio
Ian Grant is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 05:48 PM   #9 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 594
During the controversy about Ilford's rapid FB print washing technique, in which fixing is done, I think, with film-strength fixer for a very short time in order to prevent fixer from penetrating the paper base much, it was said by various people that the technique does not work with some brands of paper incl Kodak, because they need longer fixing. I don't have any references, sorry, because I never liked the idea of fast fixing. And I used some non-Ilford papers.
john_s is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum
Old 07-02-2009, 06:37 PM   #10 (permalink)
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posts: 3,572
Quote:
Originally Posted by Doremus Scudder View Post
Kodak's recommendation for fiber-base papers (from the instruction
sheet packed with the product) are longer: 6-10 minutes for single
bath at "paper strength" (1+7) and no recommendation
for "film strength."

Doremus Scudder www.DoremusScudder
I think it must have been faster 50 years ago when I switched
to Rapid. Now days I'm back to Slow, in more ways than one.

The one minute fix in film strength is an Ilford invention. That
one minute fix is followed by a 5-10-5 high intensity wash-
hca-wash. The one minute fix and following wash routine
are the quickest way to a well fixed and washed print.
No more than that IMO.

Those times, BTW, do they stand for the last print through
a fixer at it's limits of capacity? Dan
dancqu is offline   Reply With Quote Ignore this user Ignore this thread Ignore this forum

APUG.ORG Block Ads. (APUG Subscribers have the option of closing this block)