Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,956   Posts: 1,522,957   Online: 1224
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: HC-110 Dil "H"

  1. #1
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,238
    Images
    73
    Was out this weekend in our glorious Rocky Mountains and decided to do a quick test. I had used the HC110 Dil H on some FP4 35mm a couple of weeks ago and was rather pleased. Seemed to handle a very contrasty situation for me.

    This time I exposed some 4x5 APX 100 rated at 80asa (as per tests). One sheet developed in Dil B and one sheet developed in Dil H. The only difference I can see is that the Dil H seemed to give me a N+1.3 push with this film. Beyond that the grain size was exactly the same and the tonality didn't seem much different except what you would expect from the N+ apparent development.

    I guess to do a proper A/B comparison I would need to determine my developing time for the Dil H for N development. But this seems to be a lot of work for probably not much benefit.

    Has anyone else done any extensive work with the Dil H?

    Just for those that don't know Dil H is just 1/2 of Dil B, and you double your development time from Dil B (as a starting point).
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  2. #2
    bmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,156
    Images
    9
    Haven't done any experimenting with it yet, but with the new shorter dev times, I have a feeling that Dil H will be the new B if ya catch my drift.
    hi!

  3. #3
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,238
    Images
    73
    Actually I think I just found out why the negs came out a bit dense. I should have multiplied the development time by 1.4 instead of 2. Duh.

    I will try it again but this time I will do:
    1. dil b
    2. dil h with time X 1.4 of dil b
    3. rodinal 1:50
    4. rodinal 1:100 with time X 1.4 of 1:50

    What I am looking for is an increased tonal range, but with out increasing grain.

    If anyone has done this testing and wants to share their results that would be great. I hate re-inventing the wheel if it's not necessary.

    Thanks,

    Eric
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  4. #4
    Jorge Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Brazil
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    614
    You can get a starting point for dil 1+63 (I believe that's H) here:

    http://www.mironchuk.com/HC-110.html

    Times are at the end of the article (they are for 75F).

    Jorge O
    Curitiba - nice place to live, if you don't care about the weather...

  5. #5
    Eric Rose's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Calgary AB, Canada
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    4,238
    Images
    73
    Ya I saw that one. He doesn't have any times for APX 100 tho.
    www.ericrose.com
    yourbaddog.com

    "civility is not a sign of weakness" JFK

    "The Dude abides" - the Dude

  6. #6
    Jorge Oliveira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Brazil
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    614
    No, but you can compare the times for other films in HC-110 B (be careful with TX - may be wrong!) and extrapolate.

    Jorge O
    Curitiba - nice place to live, if you don't care about the weather...

  7. #7

    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    970
    Images
    3
    Dilution B gave me a time too short to use reduced (N-1, N-2) development (Kodak says that times shorter than 5 mins may produce unsatisfactory uniformity).

    I have been using Dil E (1:47), which gives me a normal dev time of about 9mins with Tri-X (TX).

    The 3 1/2 min time for the new Tri-X must be a mistake, looks like the data for Dilution A.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin