Switch to English Language Passer en langue franšaise Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 74,614   Posts: 1,647,660   Online: 929
      
Page 3 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 87
  1. #21

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    3,268
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Grant View Post
    Dosch's survbey is flawed on the one graph all the developers do in activity significantly in week 13 only to bounce back two weeks later, that says more about his methods than the developers themselves.
    Is it flawed, or is the precision lower than what is presented?
    Kirk

    For up from the ashes, up from the ashes, grow the roses of success!

  2. #22
    cmo
    cmo is offline
    cmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Shooter
    35mm RF
    Posts
    1,457
    Images
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by clayne View Post
    I'd really wish these XTOL reliability threads would just spontaneously fail and never appear again. They're tiring.
    You name it.

    And the reason is that bad workmen always blame their tools.

    If a user fails at mixing, storing or using XTol he probably needs a basic course in darkroom techniques.

    First lesson: affix a label to the bottles. Write on it:

    - "Don't use after XX/XX/XX".
    - "If diluted use min. 100ml stock solution per film."
    - "Don't drink this. It's for the films."

  3. #23
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,792
    Images
    148
    Quote Originally Posted by Kirk Keyes View Post
    Is it flawed, or is the precision lower than what is presented?
    Yes the week 13 results show there is an obvious lack of precision which makes the whole dataset less reliable or valuable, it looks like no controls were being run to calibrate the readings.

    Ian
    Last edited by Ian Grant; 08-11-2009 at 01:13 AM. Click to view previous post history. Reason: typo

  4. #24
    Tony Egan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,145
    Images
    76
    A D76/ID11 user for 10 years then moved to Xtol 10 years ago. Store stock in wine bladders and use 1+1. Have used once or twice when stock solution was over 1 year old. Never had a problem. Also read those same old articles about the 1 litre packs at the time but they were never available so I never bought them! Make the change! Keep up the demand and sales!
    And as Kirk says if in doubt use that roll of 35mm you have lying around for the fixer test to do a developer test. If it starts to turn black pretty fast it's all go!

  5. #25
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,031
    Images
    30
    Brad,
    obviously this is not anything about you, but I think more than a few of us are "exhausted" from this so called problem that has hung around for so long.

  6. #26
    fotch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    SE WI- USA
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    4,483
    Do something right a thousand time, they will take it for granted, do something wrong once, you will pay a thousand times. Especially if your Kodak.
    Items for sale or trade at www.Camera35.com

  7. #27

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Woonsocket, RI USA
    Shooter
    35mm
    Posts
    2,725
    Quote Originally Posted by david b View Post
    It is truly amazing how something so long ago can still come up.

    The problem that (rarely) occurred had to do with 1 liter bags that have long been killed.

    Follow the instructions on the bag and use distilled water and you will be fine
    I read extensively on the topic a few years ago (ca. 2005). The 1-liter bags were indeed discontinued and are widely blamed for some XTOL problems; however, some people reported problems even with the 5-liter bags. (Sorry, I didn't keep references.) Several other factors have been cited as contributing to XTOL issues:

    • Contaminants in the water, particularly metals and dissolved oxygen.
    • Storage in partially-full or air-permeable bottles.
    • Use at too-high dilutions (too little stock XTOL per unit of film). IIRC, for a 36-exposure roll of 35mm film, you need ~100ml of stock XTOL to develop a roll, so going beyond 1+1 dilution is risky unless you use significantly more developer than is required to cover the reels. This effect is rumored to be greater for some films, such as T-Max 100, than for others.
    • XTOL usually doesn't discolor with age or when it goes bad, so it can be hard to tell when you're taking a risk.


    Some people dismiss these issues, when they cause problems, as "user error," but IMHO they should be emphasized for new users so that those people don't commit the errors. Also, there's a logical fallacy I see frequently in XTOL fans' posts: They say "I've used it for x years without problems, therefore it has no problems." Well, a product (any product) can have problems only under certain conditions, or only very rarely. The fact that one person hasn't seen problems doesn't mean anything. Take another type of problem in another product to see my point: Any time there's a food poisoning scare (mad cow disease, E. coli in lettuce, etc.), millions of people eat the products as they're being recalled and don't fall ill. Just a few people become ill. Few people would accept the reasoning "well, I ate some lettuce just yesterday, so there's no problem with E. coli in the lettuce!"

  8. #28
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,792
    Images
    148
    Those comments are true for any Powder developer, like ID-11, D76, Microdol-X, Perceptol etc.

    Ian

  9. #29
    david b's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    None of your business
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    4,031
    Images
    30
    We are not talking about life or death situations here.

    If you fear a developer because of a now rare occurrence, then don't use it. There are plenty of others still out there, or you can even make your own xtol like developer.

    I am just sick and tired of people trolling through photo.net, seeing a thread where one guy f*cked up his prize winning shot because he mixed xtol wrong or stored it wrong, and then forty more people chime in with useless babble about how they won't use it because of something that might or might not even happen.

    If you cannot follow the directions on the bag and you are unwilling to use distilled water (which is not on the bag but it is in every frickin' thread about the ancient xtol failure), then get another developer. Find some pre-made liquid that does not require storage or any kind of mixing. Something like rodinal.

    I can only speak from my experience with xtol. I've never had a problem. I mix it with distilled water. I stored it in 1 liter chemical bottles. I use it at 1+1 but have used it at 1+2 with zero problems. It is fantastic with just about any film I have tried and currently love it with TMY2.

  10. #30
    Ian Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    West Midlands, UK, and Turkey
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    16,792
    Images
    148
    I think your sentiment is right David, I have yet to hear of anyone who actually suffered from the almost mythical Xtol sudden death Syndrome.

    Ian



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  Ś   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin