Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 68,770   Posts: 1,484,244   Online: 1109
      
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    David Ruby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    203
    Images
    6
    I just read something in some Kodak literature that I've never noticed before. In some literature about development times for some film, it says that the recommended times are for diffusion enlargers and to reduce the times by 20%-30% for condensor enlargers.

    I've never noticed anything like this before, so I've never reduced any times I've found before. I don't really ever having a problem, but I guess I should ask the group. Have I been missing the boat here? Anyone else seen this little note in the tech data? Thanks.

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Uxbridge On.Ca.
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    414
    I believe that note has been part of their tech data for quite some time.
    Brian McDowell

  3. #3
    gma
    gma is offline
    gma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    793
    Images
    9
    I thought it is that developing times are based on condenser enlarger and to use 20 % more time for diffuser type.
    [FONT=Century Gothic][/FONT][SIZE=7][/SIZE][COLOR=DarkOrange][/COLOR] I may be getting older, but I refuse to grow up!

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    965
    Images
    58
    I rememeber being told by a professor that the times manufactures gave were usually for diffuser enlargers, and that matched my feeble attempts at E.I. testing...
    Both films I have tested (35mm tri-x and 120 macophot up 100) tested pretty dang close to what a diffuser would need on the high values, folllowing manufacturer's specs (efke specs for the maco).
    To kind of enforce the point, I was the only one printing with diffusion heads in my class, and everyone else had to drop dev times at least 20-25% to print on condenser.

    Keep in mind that my ignorance is only surpassed by my faulty memory, so don't hate me if I'm wrong.

  5. #5
    Paddy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Vancouver, B.C., Canada
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    338
    Images
    25
    I think it's already been covered here, but for clarity's sake here's my two cents' worth,...

    Diffusion light sources (aka dichroic colour heads) are typically lower in contrast than condenser heads; therefore (B&W) film is usually developed slightly longer to correct for this. It's all relative.

    In densitometric terms, it's as follows:

    Zone I exposure: 0.10 above fb+f (up to .20 a la Mr. Hutchings)

    Zone VIII exposure: 1.25 to 1.35 (net) above fb+f for a diffusion enlarger
    Zone VIII exposure: 1.15 to 1.25 (net) above fb+f for a condenser enlarger

    For the sake of reference, your Zone V exposure should be as follows:

    Zone V exposure: 0.65 to 0.75 (net) above fb+f for a diffusion enlarger
    Zone V exposure: 0.60 to 0.70 (net) above fb+f for a condenser enlarger
    "If I'm a rebel sanctioned by society, encouraged by my parents, and cheered on by Hallmark, what is left to rebel against?"
    Hal Niedzviecki

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    958
    Kodak used to publish development times for condenser enlargers. Several years ago they changed their times to use diffusion enlargement as the standard (probably has to do with all the color heads in use).

  7. #7
    gma
    gma is offline
    gma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    793
    Images
    9
    Thanks for the clarification. I was looking at a 1974 Kodak time & temp chart. The times back in those days were for condenser. I guess that shows my age.

    gma



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin