Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 69,988   Posts: 1,524,054   Online: 970
      
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    30
    Hi to all. I'm going to give Pyrocat-hd a go and need some help prior to the plunge. It seems that there is a loss of effective film speed, but the reports vary as to how much. I use 4x5 Delta 100, FP4-plus and HP5-plus in an HP combiplan tank taking approx 1000-1200ml of solution.Normally I agitate continuously for 30 secs then 4 inversions on the minute for the remainder. Any suggestions for starting points for film speeds and times for these combinations to help with my tests?
    Thanks -Mike
    If you live forever, you'll learn everything. Living forever is the problem...

  2. #2
    Leon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Kent, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,075
    I use HD 1:1:100 with gentle agitation for roll film (ie 10 second agitation every 3 mins). I find that most films lose about 2/3 to 1 stop speed this way. Mind you my tests arent overly scientific.

    have fun!

  3. #3

    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    6,242
    My experience with Pyrocat indicates that quite often it supports full film speed. The sole exception that I have encountered has been Efke PL 100.

    When you ask a question as you did it leaves a great deal unsaid. For instance how one meters (I use incident), where one places their low value exposure if spot metering, whether the image is normally, expansion, or contraction developed. What your negatives are to be used for (contact printing or enlarging).

    Insofar as time of development, I would recommend the article that Sandy King wrote and is posted on www.unblinkingeye.com. You will find times for various films. From those times I would extrapolate times allowing for differences in developing procedures.

    Best of luck with Pyrocat. I find that it is a wonderfully versatile developer.

  4. #4

    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    971
    I have been using a batch of the metol version of Pyrocat-HD (metol amount = 10 times the recommended amount of phenidone). This version is stated by Sandy as being fractionally slower than the standard formula. I'm getting a good solid 320 out of HP5+ in 120 size. I am very pleased with this, since I got barely 200 out of PMK with the same film.

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    30
    O.K. a bit more detail. I spot meter for the shadows either a typical Zone 1 being a smidge over f=fb values (or 0.08-0.12,) or Zone3-4 being very solid shadow detail with a net neg density in the 0.4 range. I aim for a Zone 8 around a net 1.35 desity. I only print on silver gelatin conventional (fibre or r/c ) variable contrast paper. I realise the stain will bamboozle a white light densitomiter, so I will either adjust by trying the blue channel, or just keep trying until I get negs that fit my needs. Hence the post, your advice has been taken on board and appreciated- it will speed things up for me and I look forward to more of the same.
    Thanks again.-Mike
    P>S why wasn't I told of this site before? It's fantastic...
    If you live forever, you'll learn everything. Living forever is the problem...

  6. #6
    gainer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    3,726
    Images
    2
    I use incident light measurement with manufacturer's rating. If I use the spot meter, I multiply manufacturer's rating by 4 and read the significant shadow. I have not found Pyrocat-HD to lose any film speed.
    Gadget Gainer

  7. #7
    bmac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    San Jose, CA
    Posts
    2,156
    Images
    9
    Quote Originally Posted by gainer
    I use incident light measurement with manufacturer's rating. If I use the spot meter, I multiply manufacturer's rating by 4 and read the significant shadow. I have not found Pyrocat-HD to lose any film speed.
    You multiply it by 4? So basically, HP5+ would be rated at 1600?
    hi!

  8. #8
    clay's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,118
    Images
    8
    Yeah, but remember you are incident metering the shadows, NOT the brightly lit areas. Same idea as spot metering the shadowed areas and stopping down two stops. I sometimes will just turn the dome facing down, away from the sun or cast a shadow with my hand if I need to find this meter reading.

  9. #9
    PJC
    PJC is offline

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Colorado, USA
    Posts
    35
    Greetings,

    My experience may add some confusion, but this is what I have found...

    To date I've only used Pyrocat in a Jobo rotary processor, with constant agitation and largely with 8x10 film at minimum rotation. The 8x10 was always processed with AZO or alt process printing in mind, so the 2:2:100 dilution was used. I have processed some 4x5 and some roll film using the 1:1:100 dilution.

    Observations:
    1. Film developed in the 2:2:100 dilution can always be metered at the full rated ISO and in some cases even higher. Films used so far are: Efke PL25, PL100, Kodak TMY, Ilford FP4+, Delta 100, Photo Warehouse 125 and Fortepan 200.

    2. Films developed in the 1:1:100 dilution and most particularily roll films need to be exposed at a reduced EI. In 4x5, films such as Kodak TMX, Ilford Delta 100 and FP4+ EI 80, but Agfa APX for some strange reason is only EI 32 and I wont develop it in Pyrocat anymore - I can get full film speed from other developers.

    3. Roll films typically lose from 1-2 full stops from manufacturer's rated ISO. The only exception I found to this was Kodak TMY, which yielded very close to full film speed.

    It should be noted that I haven't conducted sensitometric tests on roll film as I haven't had time and don't use them often. All metering is with a calibrated, Zone VI modified Pentax spot meter, with shadows metered on Zone III.

    I hope this helps, but perhaps it accounts for some reports of full film speed and conflicting reports of loss of film speed.

    Regards, Pete

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Greenville, SC
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    4,813
    Images
    5
    I have done hundreds if not thousands of very carefully controlled test of Pyrocat-HD for EFS and CI (with reference to other tests using the standard D76 1:1) . Most of these tests have been done with sheet film in BTZS tubes with very gentle rotation, but quite a number have been done with roll film on spiral reels in tanks. All of my tests are exposed with light integrators and developed in controlled environments in which the temperature is held to =/- 0.5ºF.


    In all of my tests I have never encountered a situation when Pyrocat_HD did not deliver full emulsion speed, even with the short developing times required for silver gelatin printing. And with AZO and alternative processes, which require a higher CI, my tests have always given much higher EFS values than rated emulsion speed.

    And the greatest increase in EFS has always been with the 1:1:100 dilution, which of course is entirely consistent with what one expects in theory.


    Sandy King

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin