Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,274   Posts: 1,534,677   Online: 1049
      
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15
  1. #11

    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Valley Stream, NY
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    3,216
    D-76, 1+1 is very good for this film. XTOL at the same dilution is even better. I've used XTOL almost exclusively with this film and have always had good results.
    Frank Schifano

  2. #12
    David A. Goldfarb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Honolulu, Hawai'i
    Shooter
    Large Format
    Posts
    17,229
    Images
    20
    Okay, you folks are driving me to try Xtol. What's another test, after all, and I've got about 75 sheets of TMX 8x10" around.
    flickr--http://www.flickr.com/photos/davidagoldfarb/
    Photography (not as up to date as the flickr site)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com/photo
    Academic (Slavic and Comparative Literature)--http://www.davidagoldfarb.com

  3. #13

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    79
    Images
    3

    another site for great photos

    Hi, Just wanted to link another site for great photos.
    http://www.chipforelli.com/

  4. #14

    Join Date
    May 2004
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    1
    Hi everyone I'm new so I hope this works.
    I have found over recent times that Kodak has changed something on TMAX both 100 or 400. It looks grainy and dirty it's as though the fixer wont clear the film properly. I have done tests using FP4 and have eliminated chemicals being exhausted or contaminated. I was using Tmax developer and Ilfordtech. There did not seem a difference.
    Regards
    Rolf

  5. #15
    KenM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Calgary, Alberta
    Shooter
    4x5 Format
    Posts
    800
    Quote Originally Posted by JMcLaug351
    Hi, Just wanted to link another site for great photos.
    http://www.chipforelli.com/
    Chip does some interesting stuff. He does a lot of long exposures, utilizing ND filters heavily. These long exposures lend a dreamy quality to his work. Very nic.

    The interesting thing about Chip is that he has his negatives scanned, and then performs most of his manipulations in Photoshop. He then makes his prints in a traditional wet darkroom with a digitally created negative, with further (minor) manipulations.

    I had the opportunity to meet him and see his show at the Whyte Museum in Banff Alberta last October - he's a very good printer, with a wonderful eye. Very strong compositions, and of mostly everyday scenes that I think most people, including myself, would pass by.

    For the equipment buffs in the crowd, he uses Hasselblad (501cm I think, and the 905SWC) cameras, and a Linhof Master Technica.
    Cheers!

    -klm.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12


 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin