Switch to English Language Passer en langue française Omschakelen naar Nederlandse Taal Wechseln Sie zu deutschen Sprache Passa alla lingua italiana
Members: 70,545   Posts: 1,544,482   Online: 1087
      
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,410
    Images
    4

    Kentmere Art Classic - Contrast(s)

    I recently bought a new packet of Kentmere Art Classic to try for the first time. Unfortunately have been really struggling with it. Admittedly I tend to like a fairly contrasty image, but on Grade V been getting flat uninspiring results with the paper. The blacks just aren't black .... maybe this is the intent and design of it's purpose(?)
    I wondering if anyone knows if it is normal?

  2. #2
    Les McLean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Northern England on the Scottish border
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    1,610
    John

    Art Classic is a single grade paper about 2 to 2.5 which is the reason for the flat prints if you would normally print the image on grade V. You need to produce a negative of higher contrast. You can increase the contrast of single graded paper in a number of ways but I am just leaving home for a few days on a photographic trip and have'nt got the time to describe them at present, will do when I return.

  3. #3
    noseoil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Tucson
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,898
    Images
    17
    John, do you have access to a step wedge? If so, try a test exposure at your "normal" exposure and development time and see how it prints compared to your paper of choice. If you already have a test film which has worked for you, try printing on the new stock and see where zones I & VIII fall. This is the easiest way I know of sounding the depths of a new film-paper combination.

    The Stouffer step wedge really is a wonderful tool to have in the darkroom. The information from just one exposure is fascinating to see on a print. I don't know of a simpler, better, more comprehensive test of any film and paper, without a densitometer.

  4. #4
    Leon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Kent, England
    Shooter
    Medium Format
    Posts
    2,075
    Quote Originally Posted by John McCallum
    ... Admittedly I tend to like a fairly contrasty image, but on Grade V been getting flat uninspiring results with the paper.
    this reads like you have been using it with contrast filters or settings? is that right?

  5. #5

    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    New Zealand
    Shooter
    Multi Format
    Posts
    2,410
    Images
    4
    Thank you very much for the responses. All filled in a gap for me.

    Les, thanks for the enlightenment, this explains a great deal. Somehow I missed that labelling and made an assumption. I do normally vary my contrast filtering considerably, depending upon the neg and the look I'm after (quite right Leon). But I guess my tastes are often towards the higher contrast image. I think the image I chose to print on the Classic was not the correct choice, and my methods could stand to be adjusted to get the right result on this paper!

    noiseoil I haven't tried the Stouffer step wedge, but sounds pretty interesting. Is it a filter of some kind? The neg I chose to print has a fairly high proportion of highlight as can be seen here http://www.apug.org/gallery/showphot...sort=4&cat=501 , the rock and foreground of which I did print at grade 4 1/2 to give the effect I wanted (actually too dense in this representation, but you might get the idea).

    But as I mentioned, found it difficult to replicate on the Kentmere Classic.



 

APUG PARTNERS EQUALLY FUNDING OUR COMMUNITY:



Contact Us  |  Support Us!  |  Advertise  |  Site Terms  |  Archive  —   Search  |  Mobile Device Access  |  RSS  |  Facebook  |  Linkedin